NY Post Columnist Reveals the Impeachment Trap a Radical Judge Set for Trump
This Showdown Between a Trump-Deranged Woman and a MAGA Supporter Was Absolute Cinema
Wait, Did the Opening Paragraphs of This NYT Piece Say the Quiet Part...
This Detail About a Top Dem Influencer Raised Some Eyebrows for a Second
How the Trump Administration Plans to Outmaneuver District Judge on Deportation Flight Cas...
Bukele's Assessment of What Activist Judges Are Doing to Trump Agenda Goes Viral—for...
They Won’t Condemn It Because They Don’t Condemn it
Protecting Kids Online Means Empowering Parents
A Seed Oil Ban Would Raise Grocery Prices, Not Make America Healthy Again
President Trump Guides US Steel Deal
Governor Youngkin Can Preserve Financial Access for Vulnerable Virginians
Trump Delivers on Promise to Return Education to States. Next Up: Parents
The Left’s Embrace of Violence and the Right’s Commitment to Inalienable Rights
Trumps Gives Iran's Mullahs a Nuclear Ultimatum
We're Taking Our Country Back
Tipsheet

Hilarious: Giannoulias Can't Name A Single Spending Bill He Would Have Opposed

Bravo to the Chicago Tribune editorial board for pressing failed mob banker/US Senate candidate Alexi Giannoulias on a very straightforward question: If you had been in the US Senate over the last two years, which spending bills would you have voted against?  Alexi tries repeatedly to slither away from the issue, but "John" (who I believe to be board member John McCormick) just won't let him off the hook:
Advertisement




It's hard not to squirm listening to Giannoulias' "who me?" routine as he feigns confusion over whether McCormick is seeking a specific answer to a specific question.  McCormick's retort is priceless: "Specifically is how members of Congress vote, so yes."

At this point, you can practically hear Giannoulias enter panic mode.  With flop sweat beading around his temples, he fumbles desperately for a response--any response.  He finally lands on TARP--which, of course, passed under Buuusssshhh--so he assumes it's terra firma for hypothetical opposition.  Thinking he's regained his footing, Alexi assures the Trib's editors that he would have "looked at" TARP and "pushed hard" for greater accountability and oversight (and hey, why not a bailout for his family's failed back, at which he dispensed millions of dollars to known mobsters as a senior loan officer?).  McCormick, still hoping for an actual answer, asks for confirmation that Giannoulias is saying he'd have voted 'no' on TARP.  The jig is up.  Giannoulias backpeddals madly, seeming to concede that he, in fact,
Advertisement
would have joined Mark Kirk in voting 'yes' on TARP--but only if he had "no choice."

McCormick concludes the exchange by succinctly summarizing Giannoulias' decisive leadership qualities: "So we still haven't heard an answer.  There's no answer."  Gold.

Mark Kirk, despite his flaws, would have given a very clear, non-hypothetical answer to this question.  As a sitting Congressman, he did vote (specifically!) against the "stimulus" and every version of Obamacare

Rasmussen's latest poll shows Kirk ahead by four, while the Tribune poll gives Giannoulias a thin edge.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement