Federal Court Makes Major Ruling on Ballot Verification in Pennsylvania
Jon Stewart's Skewering of Trump in New York Civil Fraud Cause Just Blew...
Did the Hosts of 'The View' Do Their Homework When They Invited This...
Actually, Kate Middleton Does Have a Body Double...Sort of
Charlotte Radio Host Speaks Out About His Interview With KJP That Made Headlines
Trump, Biden Will Both Be in New York on Thursday...but for Very Different...
Democrat Flips Republican District in Alabama Special Election. Here's What She Campaigned...
Here's What Trump Had to Say About RFK Jr.'s VP Pick
VDH Explains What Any 'Normal' President Would Do About Border That Would End...
There Was Very Little Pete Buttigieg Was Able to Tell Us About Bridge...
An Illegal Alien Encouraged Others to Invade American Homes. Here's What Happened Next.
Time for Another Bizarre, Easily-Disprovable Lie From Joe Biden
Did Jamaal Bowman Just Help His Primary Challenger?
Fani Willis Calls Jim Jordan's Investigation Into Her Office 'Politically Motivated'
Tyson Foods Fires U.S. Workers, Exploits Illegal Aliens for Profits
Tipsheet

Media Orgs Pledge Not To Cover Koran Burning

If the much-ballyhooed burning of a Koran actually takes places, at least two news organizations won't fully cover it: Fox News and the Associated Press.  Fox says the event wouldn't be sufficiently newsworthy whatsoever.  The
Advertisement
AP hedges, only promising not to publish depictions of a burning Koran, presumably out of deference to Muslims.  Other news companies say they'd cover the event "like any other news story."

Who has it right here?  There are arguments to be made for all three approaches, and news execs ought to be asking themselves several tough questions:

(1) Gen. Petraeus, John McCain, and President Obama all agree that broadcasting images of Americans setting fire to Islam's holy text could put American servicemen abroad at greater peril.  How much should their assessment impact editorial decisions?  Is it worth making an abstract point about press freedom if it harms the men and women who are protecting that freedom?

(2) Terry Jones is a backwoods pastor with a congregation in the double digits, and Fred Phelps is just sick.  Are their threatened actions really newsworthy, or would devoting major media resources be a waste of energy and serve only to reward a publicity stunt? 
Advertisement


(3) Or is this mostly about the principle that no one religion is beyond reproach nor inoculated from offense in America?  If our media averts its eyes from a significant event purely to avoid the "Arab Street's" wrath, is our press truly free?

If you were sitting in a major news company's corner office today, how would you weigh these questions, and what would you decide?

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement