Judge Cannon Rules on Publication of Jack Smith Report
Arizona's Attorney General Vows to Continue Jack Smith's Lawfare
DeSantis Just Made an Announcement About Trump's Deportation Program
Justice Department Sets the Record Straight on a Historical Tragedy
Jennifer Rubin Quits the Washington Post. You Already Know Why.
Mark Zuckerberg's Latest Move Is Sure to Infuriate the Authoritarian Left
Discussion of School Shootings Betrays How Gun Grabbers Misrepresent Everything
A Parental Rights Law Is Now on the Books in This State
Newsom, Other Democrats Solicit Funds for ActBlue
How Bad Are Joe Biden's Ratings As He Prepares to Leave Office?...
Fani Willis Just Can't Let the Trump Case Go
Media Capitalize on Concerns Over 'Train Wreck' Hearings
You Won't Believe What This Trans Athlete Said About Competing Against Women
Senate Needs to Put Homeland Security First and Confirm Noem
The Man Detained With a Blowtorch Near an LA Wildfire Has Been Identified
Tipsheet

CNN Shaping The Election: What About Abortion On The Ballot?

In 1984 President Reagan said: "When the lives of the unborn are snuffed out, they often feel pain, pain that is long and agonizing."

You may often hear the liberal argument against professing Christians: We believe in science and you do not. The darkness in this statement can be easily brought to light. First, science tells us NOTHING about morality: whether something is right or wrong, good or evil, ugly or beautiful, loving or unkind, etc. Science provides us with results. After much scrutiny, experimentation, and testing, these results become facts. Now what? Based on liberal argumentation, these facts or results are enough, but they are not.
Advertisement


For example, let's say science could prove--without a doubt--that the Earth was cooling or heating. Now what? Is this good or is it bad? Will life expectancy increase or decrease? Will quality of life improve or diminish. In other words, science is never the proverbial nail in the coffin. But, as we all know, our personal morality determines whether scientific results amount to good or bad moral consequences.

BTW: The most precious things in life can't be scientifically proven. For example, a hug or a kiss can indicate the feeling we call love, but love itself is--in my opinion--God's funny way of showing us that we all believe things that can't be seen or proven to exist. But I digress--kinda.

Unfortunately for pro-abortionists, progress in the scientific world is not producing results that support their morality and values. This is one of the reasons why America has become more pro-life than pro-abortion.

As science proves that the baby feels pain at a younger and younger stage of gestation (which is the course it continues on), the more we see that the pro-choice/pro-abortion supporters do not believe science to be the final arbiter of their decision making--they believe in their own personal, twisted morality. That is why, at the 4:04 mark, we see Terry O'Neill (NOW's--National Org. for Women--pro-abortion advocate) uncomfortably smile when Marjorie Dannenfelser says that the
Advertisement
baby in the womb, like the mother, is a patient too. What else could she do but smile?

As human beings--and especially us political animals--we argue and fight for all kinds of policies, candidates, and obscure issues, but all this would mean nothing if our mothers had decided to abort us. Life is foundational to everything we believe.

HT: VHABEEB.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement