Australia Is What Happens When You Disarm Your Citizens
Oh, We Know What the Brown University Shooter Reportedly Said Before Opening Fire
To the Shock of No One, Australian PM Says Bondi Terrorists Motivated by...
If You Were Hoping That Trump Would Tone Down His Remarks on Rob...
Nice Try, Dems, But Your Little Stunt Against Kristi Noem Last Week Imploded...
When One Seeks Updates on the Brown University Shooting, It Shouldn't Devolve Like...
Watch a Reporter Call Out the Authorities During the Last Brown University Shooting...
It’s Not Hard to NOT Be a Jerk
This Is What 'Globalize the Intifada' Looks Like: Orthodox Jews Attacked on NYC...
The U.S. Just Conducted Another Lethal Kinetic Strike on Narco Boats
The (Non-Christmas) Lists
Tell Me Why We Lie to Ourselves
The Destructive Force Enabling Mayhem
Dreaming of a White Christmas
Outlawing Extremist Islam Is the Answer
Tipsheet

The Supreme Court Takes Up Major Case on Asylum at the Southern Border

AP Photo/John McDonnell

The Supreme Court has agreed to review a rule established by the Trump administration that sought to limit asylum seekers at the U.S.-Mexico border, in an order issued Thursday. 

Advertisement

The case, Noem v. Al Otro Lado, will determine what constitutes "arriving" in the United States, a question the Trump administration argues must be decided on the U.S. side of the southern border. When an asylum seeker "arrives" in the U.S., they must be inspected by an immigration officer and may begin the asylum process. 

The Trump administration's rule, called "metering," is when Border Patrol turns away or delays asylum-seekers at official border crossings, claiming the port is full, and restricts entry to a limited daily number. This typically occurs on the Mexico side of the border. 

An appeals court ruled that "metering" is an unlawful practice and that the asylum seeker "arrives" when they meet a U.S. immigration officer, regardless of which side of the border that happens. 

Advertisement

In 2023, the United States protected 54,350 asylum seekers, including 22,300 individuals granted asylum by U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services within DHS and 32,050 individuals defensively granted asylum by the Department of Justice’s Executive Office for Immigration Review, according to data from the Office of Homeland Security Statistics. 

A defensive grant of asylum means the individual was granted protection from deportation while already in removal proceedings.

The Supreme Court is expected to hear arguments next year and come to a decision at the beginning of summer. 

Editor’s Note: Thanks to President Trump, illegal immigration into our great country has virtually stopped. Despite the radical left's lies, new legislation wasn't needed to secure our border, just a new president.

Help us continue to report the truth about the president's border policies and mass deportations. Join Townhall VIP and use promo code FIGHT to get 60% off your membership.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos