Horror: Veteran Burns Himself Alive Next To VA Center

Matt Vespa
|
Posted: Apr 08, 2016 2:30 PM
Horror: Veteran Burns Himself Alive Next To VA Center

Last month, a veteran set fire to himself outside of a Veterans Affairs center in New Jersey. Charles Richard Ingram III, a seven-year veteran of the U.S. Navy, walked nine miles from his home in Egg Harbor, drenched himself in gasoline, and killed himself. Kenneth Lipp of the Daily Beast reported that Ingram’s injuries were horrific, with fireman noting that it’s almost incredible that he initially survived his self-immolation. At the same time, there are many questions over why Ingram did this, and whether he was obtaining proper medical treatment:

A motorist called 911, according to Capt. Paul Newman of the Northfield Police Department, and firefighters arrived three minutes later. A bystander was already at Ingram’s side, trying to extinguish the fire with blankets. Twenty minutes later, Ingram was airlifted to Temple University Burn Center in Philadelphia, where he died that evening.

“I’ve seen people die before with complications associated with minor burns, but he was 100 percent burned,” Northfield Assistant Fire Chief Lauren William Crooks told The Daily Beast. “Gasoline burns extremely hot, so how he survived the short time that he did was in my opinion a little unbelievable, but people react in unpredictable ways to trauma.”

[…]

Ingram’s last years in the Navy were aboard the amphibious command ship the USS La Salle, one of five vessels in the Persian Gulf when Iraq invaded Kuwait in August 1990. Ingram stayed at sea throughout Operations Desert Shield and Desert Storm. He was chief on deck when the La Salle cruised into Ash Shuaybay, Kuwait, on March 12, 1991, the first American warship to enter the newly liberated port.

After retiring from the service, Ingram married Billie Bessler; the two lived briefly in Pennsylvania before settling in the house she still owns in Egg Harbor.

The clinic in Northfield is a community-based outpatient clinic of the VA Medical Center in Wilmington, Delaware. The VA’s Community Based Outpatient Clinics (CBOCs) serve patients in rural or remote locations who may not be able to travel to main hubs as a result of physical disabilities or psychiatric illnesses. Since most of the specialists, including psychiatrists, only see patients at the hub medical centers, CBOCs schedule “telehealth” appointments: closed-circuit “office visit” teleconferences. (Telehealth was first pioneered in combat medicine to provide troops in places like Afghanistan access to mental health services.) The approach is not intended to work like “phoning it in,” though: The VA’s guidelines for telehealth prescribe an intensive outpatient regimen of weekly sessions taking about five hours each. If Ingram received psychiatric services at the Northfield clinic, as Capt. Newman said, then it is likely he availed himself of telehealth or was waiting to do so.

While the investigation into this tragic matter continues, Katie mentioned an equally tragic story involving Veterans Affairs, where a 31-year old Army veteran’s benefits were denied to his family upon his passing from cancer. VA doctors concluded that his cancer was not a result of his service in Iraq, so his benefits cannot be processed. Moreover, there are reports that wait-times, which formed the epicenter of this fiasco back in 2013, may have increased by 50 percent. An Inspector General report estimated that 307,000 veterans might have died waiting for health care, though the figure cannot be truly confirmed or refuted since the data within the VA Enrollment System wasn’t updated consistently, nor did they have procedures to do so. It was shoddy paperwork. As for accountability, it’s moving slower than molasses on that front. Only three people have been fired over the VA scandal. In Colorado, those VA officials are retiring “unscathed,” and did I forget to mention the bonus situation? That’s right, $142 million in bonuses were doled out to VA employees across the country last year. Maybe that money should’ve gone to fixing the VA suicide hotline, which goes to voicemail for some who decide to call for assistance. If there’s any window into the nightmare that is single-payer health care, just looks at the VA.

Oh, and the wait times are still an issue. In San Diego, a veteran’s frustration with his cancelled appointments led to a suicide attempt. In Los Angeles, “inappropriate scheduling practices” were also investigated.

From the San Diego IG report:

  • A total of 16 more MSAs [medical support assistants] were interviewed in the week following the interview of Complainant 2; many of them confirmed that they were told to schedule by directing the veteran to the next available appointment or to later zero out the desired date by canceling/rescheduling appointments. Some MSAs reported being told they had too many appointments scheduled with desired dates exceeding 14 days, so they were told to change them. If they didn’t, many noted, other MSAs or the MAO [medical administrative officer] would change their appointment desired dates anyway. Other MSAs reported being “hounded” by the MAO to zero out desired dates so, even though they knew it was against the 2010 VHA [Veterans Health Administration] policy, they did it because of the continual pressure. Several other MSAs declined to be interviewed when contacted by OIG special agents.
  • On June 25, 2014, OIG received information from a VA employee that a veteran had attempted suicide at a CBOC located in San Diego, due to his frustration with his canceled appointments. OIG staff reviewed the veteran’s historical appointments in VistA, which showed that the veteran’s appointments had been canceled since early 2014, and the desired dates of his rescheduled appointments were captured incorrectly. The veteran last saw his Mental Health provider in early 2014. He then had an appointment scheduled for several months later, which was also canceled by the clinic. The veteran was then scheduled to see his Mental Health provider near the date OIG learned of the suicide attempt, but that appointment was canceled by the clinic, as well. Ultimately, the veteran was scheduled in advance to see the provider the following month, but by the time the data was reviewed, the appointment had already been canceled by the clinic. The veteran was not scheduled to see his provider until 1 month later. The veteran was admitted to the VAMC after his suicide attempt. When interviewed by OIG staff, the veteran stated he used the cancellation of his appointments as an excuse to act out and attempted to harm himself. He said he regrets his actions and that he received help and now has follow-up appointments. He had been seeing the same provider since 2009 and never had an appointment canceled until 2014. He estimated that his appointments were canceled four times in a row, which triggered his behavior.
  • A VAMC San Diego Mental Health program analyst sent three emails, dated April 15, 22; and 30, 2014, and identified during an OIG email search, in which she appeared to direct MSAs to alter desired dates incorrectly.

From the Los Angeles IG report:

  • A manager in Ambulatory Care stated the allegation was that SPS1 [supervisory program specialist] was rescheduling patient appointments and deleting comments in VistA [Veterans Health Information Systems and Technology Architecture]. He stated the VISN 22 System Redesign office staff investigated and found that SPS1 had changed approximately 680 out of the 750 appointments reviewed.
  • MSA3 reported that when patients came to VA and wanted to schedule an appointment as soon as possible, a “T” was entered into VistA. MSAs would bring up the scheduling tool to find the next available appointment date and offer that to the patient. The MSA would then completely exit out of VistA, go back into VistA and schedule the appointment on the next available date, while making the desired date the same as the appointment date. This made the patient wait time zero. At a staff meeting in September or November 2013, SPS1 told MSAs this was how he wanted appointments scheduled and that was how management was telling him they wanted it done…He said MSAs never used the Electronic Wait List (EWL) and added that it was an unspoken thing that if a scheduler didn’t schedule using these techniques, it would influence his/her review.
  • He [a System Redesign manager] then looked at scheduling numbers for SPS1 and the three other supervisors at the clinic and determined that SPS1 was not scheduling appropriately and not supervising his MSAs correctly. He asked all the supervisors if they ever told employees to “zero out” wait times and they all denied it. He also asked several MSAs if they were ever asked to zero out wait times. All said no, except one who asked if his answer was off the record. When he told the MSA “No,” the MSA then said, “Well then, no, I was never asked to zero out wait times.”
  • A manager for Outpatient Clinic operations reported that she never taught her schedulers to ask patients if they wanted the next available appointment date, then use that date as both the appointment date and the patient’s desired date. She refused to do this when she was a supervisor in Primary Care, which caused her wait times to be higher. She heard that she was moved out of Primary Care because of this. She stated that she also heard that SPS1 in Primary Care told his schedulers to make patient appointments this way. She heard that SPS1 was changing desired dates. She provided a copy of an email she sent to a senior facility manager in June 2013, in which she informed him that a preliminary look at the patients’ waiting report showed that there were 2,845 patients waiting for appointments downtown in Primary Care, and 2,215 of them (78 percent) had a zero-day wait (meaning that the desired date is the same as the appointment date.)
  • The former Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System (GLA) Director reported that she became aware of allegations that SPS1 was manipulating patient wait times when she received an email from the complainant around April 2014…After she was notified of this issue, the senior management official admitted to her that he was notified about it in 2013, by the complainant or another employee, but did not take any action.

Let’s not forget the ongoing breaches in medical privacy at VA centers across the country, with 11,000 such incidents since 2011. The stories alone demonstrate nothing more than a serial history of incompetence. In Asheville, North Carolina, a male VA employee accessed the records of a female patient that he was either dating, or intended on dating, only leading to the patient being informed that her records were accessed. In Western New York, the wife of a veteran had her brother-in-law stop at the VA to obtain information about benefits. She instead got the information of eight deceased veterans, including their social security numbers, diagnoses, death certificates, and other personal effects. At Mountain Home, Tennessee, a housekeeper stumbled upon the social security numbers, patient names, and dates of birth of over 100 veterans.

Besides medical privacy issues and wait times, there’s the question about access to medication. In February, CBS News reported that 200,000 veterans with Hepatitis C couldn’t be treated with what’s being described as a miracle drug because it’s too expensive. It’s just another item on a long, long list of problems plaguing the VA, though Hillary Clinton doesn’t appear to think that there are any issues at all. Do you remember when she said it wasn’t a “widespread” problem? People don’t forget.

UPDATE: Sorry, three Phoenix VA leaders were fired last month, according to a press release by Concerned Veterans For America:

“We are pleased the VA has finally, nearly two years after the revelations in Phoenix, pledged to hold those responsible for veteran wait lists accountable. There is today no question that Lance Robinson, Darren Deering and Brad Durry were intimately involved in the manipulation of wait lists that possibly led to the deaths of dozens, even hundreds, of veterans. Though these are merely proposals for termination, we hope the VA acts affirmatively in support of true accountability. We also encourage the federal bureaucrats at the Merit Systems Protection Board to recognize the need to restore trust in the Department of Veterans Affairs and the broader civil service, and uphold these measures when they are inevitably appealed.”