Based on the Preliminary Info About the Trump Trial Jurors, the Rigged Narrative...
New NPR CEO's Take on the First Amendment Is What You'd Expect
There Are School Walkouts Happening Over Furries. Please Shoot Me Into the Sun.
Israel Strikes Back
Are Iran's Nine Lives Nearing an End?
Ich Bin Ein Uri Berliner
Hold Obama-Biden Foreign Policy Responsible for Iran's Unprecedented Attack on Israel
US Vetoes UN Resolution on Palestinian Membership
Did This Factor Into Gallagher's Early Resignation Decision?
Do Celebrities Have Deeper Liberal Thoughts?
The World Is Paying a Deadly Price for Barack Obama's Foreign Policy Legacy
Maybe Larger Families Will Produce Better Leaders, as in the Early US
The Mainstream Media: American Democracy’s Greatest Threat
We've Found the Most Insane Transgender Criminal Case Yet
Watch This Purple-Haired Democrat Demand for More Ukraine Funding In Massive Rant
Tipsheet

Daily Beast's Tomasky: 'Imagine A 6-3 Liberal Court' Post-Hobby Lobby

If you read Michael Tomaksy’s piece in the Daily Beast, it perfectly captured the liberal tantrum over their back-to-back defeats in the Supreme Court with the Hobby Lobby and Quinn decisions. He equated conservatives to lions who toy with their prey before killing and consuming it. In other words, conservatives are patient to gut laws that protect of cornerstones of American liberalism, specifically public sector unions and the less-than-necessary Voting Rights Act.

Advertisement

He later suggests the utopia that is to come with a liberal Supreme Court:

Imagine a 6-3 liberal court revisiting all of these appalling decisions. Overturning Citizens United. Reinstating the Voting Rights Act. Re-desegregating, if you follow me, the nation’s school districts. Expanding women’s right to control their physical destiny instead contracting it. And more.

Tomasky did note that conservatives took the judiciary more seriously, which has enabled us to keep them from rendering our Constitution moot. After all, our founding document keeps progressives from enacting large portions of their agenda; it constrains change.

But, is the Court leading us to a right-wing dystopia? While the Supreme Court handed liberals judicial defeats over the past two weeks, let us not forget that they upheld the constitutionality of Obamacare by saying the individual mandate falls under the taxation powers of Congress.

In fact, the nine justices agree with each other more often than not, with almost half of all cases this past term ending in unanimous decisions (via NYT):

Advertisement

In their public appearances, the justices often complain that the press focuses on closely divided cases and not on the many unanimous ones. The court is indeed often united, and it will end this term with unanimous decisions in more than half of its cases. Over the past four terms, even the members of the court least likely to agree voted together 65 percent of the time.

Liberals should keep that in mind before start dreaming about a liberal Court post-Hobby Lobby; complain about the institution’s conservative-leanings and divisions; or how Scalia is a fascist. Although, I doubt they will.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement