Levin: What Kind of Commander-in-Chief Would Nominate Chuck Hagel?

Posted: Feb 01, 2013 3:18 PM

At the American Israeli Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) Conference in 2008, then-Senator Obama stood before thousands of pro-Israel Americans and declared what appeared to be support for Israel. He explained that “the bond between Israel and the United States is rooted in more than our shared national interest; it’s rooted in the shared values and shared stories of our people.”

As the only beacon of democracy in the Middle East and the one unique example of a country in the region that allows freedom of speech and religion—as well as women’s rights—Israel has long been one of the U.S.’s strongest allies.

These days, however, we see Obama behaving in a way that suggests a sort of erosion of this bond he praised just over four years ago. The nomination of Chuck Hagel for Secretary of Defense has been seen as a sign that President Obama's attitude towards Israel is icier than his predecessors.

On his radio show today, host Mark Levin discussed this same point and made a provocative suggestion:

“Well, the Muslim Brotherhood has infiltrated our government, it's called Barack Obama. No, he's not a formal member, he's a sympathizer. There, I said it. Prove otherwise….What kind of commander-in-chief would nominate somebody like Chuck Hagel to be Secretary of Defense? I'll tell you what kind of commander-in-chief, the kind of commander-in-chief that arms the Muslim Brotherhood, Islamonazi regime in Cairo while he's hallowing out the greatest military force on the face of the earth under his direct command, the United States military -- that's what kind of commander-in-chief. Chuck Hagel, who’s a sympathizer with the most radical elements in the Middle East, and an Israel hater. So why would a president nominate somebody like Chuck Hagel? Because the president is Chuck Hagel. He's a sympathizer with the most radical elements in the Middle East and he's an Israel hater. That's why he nominated Hagel.”

While Levin’s fiery words are certainly blunt, both Obama and Hagel have done nothing to prove him wrong.