U.S. court to hear appeal over keeping U.S. demands for telecom records secret

Reuters News
|
Posted: Oct 08, 2014 3:12 AM

By Dan Levine

SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) - A U.S. appeals court is set to hear arguments on Wednesday on whether the Federal Bureau of Investigation can force Internet and telecommunications firms to turn over customer records without revealing the government's demands.

A lower court judge in San Francisco previously ruled such gag orders were unconstitutional in a lawsuit filed by an undisclosed telecom company. The government's appeal of that decision will be heard by the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.

Tech companies have sought to clarify their relationships with U.S. law enforcement and spying agencies, especially after revelations by former National Security Agency contractor Edward Snowden that outlined the depth of U.S. spying capabilities.

Twitter Inc, for instance, sued the U.S. Department of Justice on Tuesday following months of fruitless negotiations over how much information the company could disclose about government surveillance.

In the case at the 9th Circuit, the plaintiff telecom company says the FBI's gag orders surrounding so-called "national security letters" represent an "unprecedented grant of authority" and violate the First Amendment.

The government, meanwhile, calls such secrecy "vital" in national security cases because public disclosure could interfere with the probe or endanger someone's physical safety.

Tech companies including Google Inc, Microsoft Corp and Facebook Inc filed legal arguments against the government in the case.

The government may not "foist a gag order upon the involuntary recipient of an NSL," the companies wrote, "let alone prohibit the recipient from even reporting periodically the aggregate number of such demands that it receives."

The case will be heard by Judges Sandra Ikuta, N.R. Smith and Mary Murguia. Ikuta and Smith were both nominated by President George W. Bush, and Murguia was a President Barack Obama nominee.

The case in the 9th Circuit is Under Seal vs. Eric Holder Jr., 13-1597.

(Reporting by Dan Levine; Editing by Cynthia Osterman)