A 'good man' or not

Posted: Oct 20, 2004 12:00 AM

"He is not a good man." That's how Lynne Cheney summed up John Kerry after the Democratic candidate decided to engage in a little gay-baiting of her daughter in the final presidential debate last week. Was Mrs. Cheney speaking only as an "angry mom," as she admitted, or did she expose an essential truth about John Kerry?

 I don't like the recent tendency to cast political opponents as "enemies," "liars" and "evil," which the Democrats have engaged in far more than Republicans this election season. But John Kerry's actions over a lifetime do reveal a man with an unsteady moral compass, willing to say and do whatever he deems necessary to advance his own ambitions. The Bush campaign has characterized this tendency as flip-flopping, but it goes deeper than that. Kerry isn't a mere political opportunist but a man who knowingly engages in political deceit and is so contemptuous of those who disagree with him that he underestimates both their intelligence and their character.

 Kerry's remark about the vice president's daughter was no accident but a conscious effort to discourage blue-collar Democrats and Christian voters from supporting the Bush-Cheney ticket. The remark bore the fingerprints of Bob Shrum, Kerry's chief political strategist and one of the most ruthless political operatives in the business. The Shrum-Kerry tactic says worlds about these two men's disdain for working-class Americans and people of faith as yahoos and bigots who would be so turned off by the sexual orientation of one of the Republican candidate's family members that they'd stay home on Election Day.

 The move clearly backfired. By an almost two-to-one margin, Americans disapproved of Kerry's raising the issue during the debates. So Kerry moved on to more tried and true scare tactics that have worked well for the Democrats in previous elections. Indeed scare tactics have become the Democrats' stock in trade. In the last few days, Kerry has been accelerating his use of fear to motivate blocks of voters, especially the elderly, the young and blacks. Kerry is trying to scare seniors into believing that if Bush is re-elected, their Social Security benefits will be cut by 30-45 percent, alleging the president has a "January surprise" to "privatize" Social Security for current recipients. ''That's up to $500 a month less for food, for clothing, for the occasional gift for a grandchild,'' Kerry told a group of seniors in Florida earlier this week.

 Kerry has also tried to frighten young people into thinking that if Bush wins, they may face a military draft. Speaking in Des Moines, Iowa, Kerry claimed, ''With George Bush, the plan for Iraq is more of the same and the great potential of the draft, because if we go it alone, I don't know how you do it with the current overextension.''

 And Kerry and his surrogates have consistently tried to convince blacks that the Republicans have a plan to cheat them of their votes -- which they claim is how Bush won the presidency in 2000, despite the lack of evidence to back up such a scurrilous claim. With polls showing President Bush has substantially increased his support in the black community, Kerry wants to make blacks believe the president is little different than Bull Connors. One campaign flyer even shows water hoses being turned on black voters during the 1950s, with the clear implication that Republicans would do the same today to keep blacks from the polls if they could.

 Kerry knows these charges are untrue -- but still he makes them and encourages his supporters to do likewise. And his run for the presidency is not the first time in which John Kerry has been willing to spread lies to accomplish his aims. In 1971, in an attempt to undermine support for the war in Vietnam, he went so far as to claim that he had personally committed atrocities while an officer in Vietnam, something he now admits was untrue. To this day, however, Kerry has never apologized to those soldiers whose honor he sullied when he accused them of having "raped, cut off ears, cut off heads, taped wires from portable telephones to human genitals and turned up the power, cut off limbs, blown up bodies, randomly shot at civilians, razed villages in a fashion reminiscent of Genghis Khan, shot cattle and dogs for fun, poisoned food stocks, and generally ravaged the countryside of Vietnam."

 Lynne Cheney was right. This is not a good man -- and that is the reason voters should reject him on Nov. 2.