Americans Have Stopped Trusting the Pentagon With Their Lives
So, That's Why John Fetterman's Hospital Stay Got Extended Another Two Weeks
Adam Schiff: Scumbag
The Sorry State Of Service In America
The Left is the Left is the Left
Like Bees to Honey
Where is the 2023 Version of the 56 Signers of The Declaration of...
Government Should Stand Aside on JetBlue-Spirit Airlines Merger
Police Our Borders, Not the Globe
Meet the Young Attorney Who May Have Saved Kari Lake’s Election Challenge
Unity: The Path Forward for Americans
A Protest Worthy of a Nation in Distress
Pardon Kevin Madrid
Joe Biden: 'I Applaud China... Excuse Me, I Applaud Canada'
Trump Announces Texas Leadership Team, Snubs Cruz and Abbott

Obama Must Meet GOP Deal, Or No Deal

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of

WASHINGTON -- The debt limit battle is heating up, the second of three 2011 heavyweight budget fights whose outcome could have a major impact on the 2012 presidential election.

The national debt will near its statutory limit of $14.3 trillion next week unless Congress allows the Treasury to continue borrowing enough money to pay the government's bills. House Speaker John Boehner said Monday that Republicans would let this happen only if President Barack Obama and the Democrats agree to major budget reductions, with no tax increases.

The GOP's demand: $2 trillion in spending cuts or it's no deal.

The American people are justifiably fed up with deepening deficits and debts that have weakened our economy and undermined future prosperity. They don't like the out-of-control spending of the past two years, nor the gimmicks that have permeated budget policies. They want the political game-playing to stop and the adults to take charge of reining in spending without endangering economic growth and new job creation.

President Obama has been lurching all over the place on budget strategy, throwing down the gauntlet against Republican budget cuts in last month's speech, which was dripping in presidential politics and offered little in the way of significant budget cuts.

The spendthrift budget plan the president submitted in February for 2012 was dressed in nice-sounding words that hid its true intent. "Rather than fight the same tired battles that have dominated Washington for decades, it's time to try something new. Let's invest in our people without leaving them a mountain of debt," he wrote in his budget.

"Fine words. Unfortunately, his budget is almost a line-by-line repudiation of this policy," Heritage Foundation economist J. D. Foster wrote in a budgetary analysis then. Under Obama's budgets, the deficit this year will swell to a record $1.645 trillion, and the national public debt over 10 years would rise by $7.2 trillion, Foster says.

The president's words are "couched in terms of fiscal restraint and fiscal discipline. The numbers tell a different story," he adds.

But then Obama's polling numbers, giving him poorer marks on budget policy, forced a change in tone if not in strategy.

This week, in an hour-long strategy session with Democratic leaders in Congress, Obama urged them to cool their rhetoric in the negotiations to come and warned them not to "draw a line in the sand."

From the White House's perspective, the debt limit is nothing to fool around with. Without borrowing authority, Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner would have to forgo payments on our debts, though he has tools at his disposal that allow him to keep paying the bills through Aug. 2.

Still, just the hint that the debt limit would not be lifted would send domestic and international financial markets into turmoil along with our own economy, plunging the dollar and threatening another recession, which would end Obama's prospects for a second term.

Obama is now caught between his own spend-like-there's-no-tomorrow policies and his leftist political base, which opposes any cuts in spending. The far left is urging all Democrats not to agree to any deal that includes cutting Medicare.

Meantime, several dozen business groups, including the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and some of the nation's largest banks, sent a letter urging lawmakers to raise the debt ceiling in "timely" steps but said nothing about spending cuts.

"Raising the statutory debt limit is critical to ensuring global investors' confidence in the creditworthiness of the United States," they said.

In the end, the debt limit will be raised -- perhaps in incremental steps -- with an agreement to cut spending by some amount over the next 10 years.

However, it isn't exactly clear how much that debt-limit agreement will govern the third battle to come this summer over the size and shape of the 2012 budget and the appropriations to put it into effect.

My guess is that Boehner and the House Republicans have the upper hand in this titanic struggle over the size and cost of our government.

The Democrats have a firewall in the Senate that can kill any bill that comes from the House. But Obama also understands there will be no agreement on the debt limit or next year's budget unless his side meets the House at least halfway or more. And that he cannot afford to head into the 2012 election year without putting the nation's fiscal house in order.

Obama said, "Showing an unwillingness to compromise would not only limit the ability to reach a deal with Republicans but could also have a negative impact on financial markets," the Washington Post reported Wednesday.

Geithner has painted an ominous picture of what would happen to the economy if the debt limit isn't raised, but Obama's political advisers have crafted an even bleaker outlook of his bid for a second term if the country descends into economic turmoil again.

Boehner's tough no-budging stance on spending cuts speech in New York this week came at the right time. Obama got the message.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member


Trending on Townhall Video