If you asked most Americans today what the biggest threat to our future prosperity is you would get answers like competition from abroad, outsourcing, the subprime mortgage crisis, and the wave of illegal immigration swamping the labor market.
Those answers would be wrong.
In fact, the biggest threat to Americans’ continued prosperity is the growing disquiet about our economic prospects in the face of those challenges, and the economic populism that is bursting out in response to these fears. Democratic presidential candidate John Edwards has distilled those fears into the central message of his campaign, but echoes of his message can be heard in most of the Presidential candidates’ pitches for votes. Certainly much of Governor Mike Huckabee’s meteoric rise in the polls can be attributed to his ability to tap into middle-class fears about the economy’s future.
Edwards’ campaign is built almost entirely on a foundation of class warfare—“the people versus the powerful”—and is chock full of attacks on business, the “wealthy,” and just about anyone who stands in the way of remaking the American economy into a nanny-state paradise built upon government protection and largesse.
Middle class unease about America’s future prospects in the world economy is coming to be a dominant theme in the 2008 elections, no matter who the Democrats and Republicans ultimately choose as their nominees, barring a resurgence of violence in Iraq or another terrorist attack on American soil, of course.
Unfortunately, Americans are woefully undereducated when it comes to the real roots of our enduring prosperity. Since at least the time of the Great Depression, many Americans have been taught that the government somehow “controls” the economy—and that good times and bad have been the product primarily of the economic stewardship of the President and Congress. This is a deeply dangerous illusion for a number of reasons. While it is certainly true that the government—particularly in these times when government spending is such a large and growing part of the economy—can have profound impacts on economic growth, it is certainly not the case that government policy has ever been particularly successful at driving that growth.
In fact, quite the opposite is the case. Government policies have proven time and again capable of slowing economic growth, but with few exceptions they have never proven capable of stimulating the economy in the long term. Even policies that economic conservatives think of as “pro-growth,” such as deregulation, tax cuts and reducing trade barriers are more accurately thought of as the removal of government-created barriers to growth than actual government stimulants to economic activity.
For instance, oil prices have skyrocketed because demand for oil has climbed steadily, particularly in Asia and India as their economies have grown. Conversely, the prices of electronics have dropped precipitously for precisely the same reason, as China in particular has become a manufacturing power due to the adoption of ever freer markets.
These changes have generated enormous anxiety among Americans, fueling fear that our place as the dominant engine of economic growth in the world is threatened. Compounding those fears is the realization that with globalization inevitably some will be winners and others losers as the changes ripple through our economy. Change is almost always frightening.
These fears are nothing new. They mirror the anxiety that accompanied the change from an agricultural to an industrial economy, and more recently the change from a more dominant and insular American economy to one that needed to compete with Japan in the 1970’s and ‘80s. Millions of jobs were displaced during these economically tumultuous times. Millions more were created. Unfortunately, the solutions offered by politicians are usually the wrong ones to ensure future prosperity.
The secret to America’s continuing prosperity is and always has been our ability to adapt rapidly to changing economic conditions. Americans find new ways to provide economic value where none existed before. The growth of government—of economic planning and barriers to change—threatens precisely these qualities that have helped America endure as the beacon of economic growth throughout the 20th Century. Imagine a world where the government tried to protect the jobs of those in the horse and buggy industry as automobiles took the world by storm.
It is our dynamism, our ability to adapt to change that has been the secret of our economic success. The growing economic populism that is the expression of our anxiety about change is precisely the wrong prescription for facing the challenges ahead.
We can’t bank our economy on keeping the jobs that exist today because in all likelihood many of them will not. Instead, we need to foster the economic conditions that ensure the creation of new jobs and new products that are as yet unimagined.
Change is the only constant we can count on. Dynamism and adaptability are the only tools that will help ensure that America stays on top of the economic ladder in the century to come.