It's Time for the Epstein Story to Be Buried
A New Poll Shows Old Media Resistance, and Nicolle Wallace Decides Which Country...
Is Free Speech Really the Highest Value?
Dan Patrick Was Right — Carrie Prejean Boller Had to Go
The Antisemitism Broken Record
Before Protesting ICE, Learn How Government Works
Republican Congress Looks Like a Democrat Majority on TV News
Immigration Is Shaking Up Political Parties in Britain, Europe and the US
Representing the United States on the World Stage Is a Privilege, Not a...
Older Generations Teach the Lost Art of Romance
Solving the Just About Unsolvable Russo-Ukrainian War
20 Alleged 'Free Money' Gang Members Indicted in Houston on RICO, Murder, and...
'Green New Scam' Over: Trump Eliminates 2009 EPA Rule That Fueled Unpopular EV...
Tim Walz Wants Taxpayers to Give $10M in Forgivable Loans to Riot-Torn Businesses
The SAVE Act Fight Ends When It Lands on Trump's Desk for Signature
Tipsheet

Vance Identifies 3 Major Problems With the Senate's Foreign Aid Package

Vance Identifies 3 Major Problems With the Senate's Foreign Aid Package
AP Photo/Jay LaPrete

Update: The Senate passed the measure, 70-29, early Tuesday morning with the help of 22 Republicans.  

Advertisement

Original Post: 

Republican Sen. J.D. Vance of Ohio has been sounding the alarm about the Senate’s foreign aid package for Ukraine, Israel, and Taiwan, warning the measure is not only bad policy, it's also “anti-democratic.”

Speaking to Tucker Carlson in an interview published Monday evening, the Ohio Republican said he hopes that even if the legislation passes the Senate, that it dies in the House, listing three major problems with it. 

First, the bill sends $61 billion to Ukraine to fund a “hopeless war” that will “decimate the Ukrainian population” even more than it has already done. 

“It's a terrible, terrible piece of legislation on the policy,” he said. 

Secondly, the measure does not just fund the war-torn country in 2024, Vance emphasized. 

“It actually funds Ukraine in ‘25 and ’26,” he said. “Now, what's the problem with that? Say, for example, that we have a new president in 2025, that president would be handcuffed by the promises that we are making in law to Ukraine today. If you go back to 2019, Tucker, to sort of give you a sense of why this matters. In 2019, the US House impeached then-President Donald Trump on the theory that they had appropriated money to Ukraine, and Donald Trump refused to send it to Ukraine. So if Trump is elected president again and becomes president on January of 2025, he will conduct diplomacy. And if that diplomacy does not include sending additional billions to Ukraine, there is a theoretical argument, a predicate, if you will, for impeaching Donald Trump because they have tried to tie his hands.” 

Advertisement

Related:

UKRAINE

Finally, pointing to leaks from the intelligence community, the entire purpose of the bill “is to tie a future President Trump’s hands,” he said. 

“We're not just sending billions to Ukraine in 2024. We're trying to make it impossible for the next president to conduct diplomacy on his terms. It's anti-democratic, and it will lead to endless war in all over the world,” Vance argued. 

The senator on Monday sent a memo detailing these points to his colleagues, urging Republicans to vote against the legislation. 

House Speaker Mike Johnson has issued warnings of his own, emphasizing the need to address the border.



Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement