What exactly is Islam teaching Children?

good info on your page,Dr. Dennis... it's why I can't go with Romney. Radical beliefs.

I think it's important to take notice of some things.

In recent blogs, I've re - highlighted how that conservative media are overlooking viable, positive candidates because of a fixation on Romney. Fox News and TownHall are excessively bent on promoting Romney, when he has fallen flat in places where there's a real race. He's won in the very skewed Mormon population in Nevada and in his familial tied Michigan. He's won where he is uncontested. Otherwise, he falls flat.

A real test of his candidacy occurred in the South Carolina. He spent massive dollars and came in fourth. I think this is a statement of what people really see.

As governor of Massachusetts, the job growth rate was the fourth worst in the country. And yet, he claims to be the candidate to turn the economy around?

He held an Olympics. (oops, or was it that there were some people excited about the Olympics and volunteered to make it a success?) Maybe if the Presidential candidacy were really an Olympics?

I'm not sure I like the analogy of winning my vote to winning the gold? I'm not a prize. I'm a person.

So far, Romney is winning a few prizes. I'm not sure he's winning a few persons.

Huckabee has no money, yet, he comes in 1st or 2nd in contested races. hmm...maybe Huck has something?!!!!!!!

Fred Thompson is my choice. He started too late. Mit Romney is a very good pick.He has done a great job in private bussiness and as a governor. Mike Huckabee lies about his tax hikes and is a conatant panderer. He is absolutely lousy on foreign policy. His stance on school voucher he lied about. Very poor choice. People are stupid. I have researched voting records. And performance. Mike Huckabee is a liberal.

John McCain is a disaster. He knowns nothing on how the economy works. Mit Romney does. My problem with romney is in heath care.

Mccain would sign the global warnibg treaty and that would destroy our economy forever.