Talk Radio:
Bill Bennett
Mike Gallagher
Dennis Prager
Michael Medved
Hugh Hewitt
BREAKING NEWS
Register
|
Sign In
Search
SIGN UP NOW!
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
Login
|
What's Hot
Townhall Daily Alert
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
White House & Capitol Report
Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
Daily Conservative Cartoon
Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Columnists
|
News
|
Video
|
Podcasts
|
Photos
|
Cartoons
|
Blog
|
Your Blogs
|
Issues
|
Get Magazine
|
Finance
What’s Hot
|
Your Blogs Directory
|
Create Your Own Blog
|
Featured Talk Radio Calls
Comment on:
Multi-level Utilitarianism
nukes - the answer to all things
3 Comments
Saturday, September, 27, 2008 7:11 PM
Sarah
writes:
all things 'free' at least
Freedom is not free and it definitely requires blood to get it, keep it and transfer it. I did not care much about the middle easterners lacking freedom until I realized if they don't have freedom, they will kill me to take away mine. So now, I am for water boarding and anything else under earth of destroy our enemies - and if Obama thinks he wants to talk. he should move over there and do all the talking he wants without inlcuding we the people. Oh, I gotta go polish my gun and tott it a little - just for fun. i do think the bail out would end sooner if the responsible parties were asked to serve in Iraq as restitution for the economic panic/mess.
Email It
|
Print It
|
Flag as Offensive
Saturday, September, 27, 2008 7:56 PM
dawndawn
writes:
Where Have You Been?
Motorized! You are hysterical! I am laughing so hard right now! Thanks! PS - I would like a special nuke for Madame, Nancy Pelosi! Thanks!
Email It
|
Print It
|
Flag as Offensive
Tuesday, September, 30, 2008 12:15 AM
m0t0
writes:
tnx for your comments
tnx :) i'm not sure about the bailout plan either .... my knowledge of economics is limited, but i've been wondering why the FDIC couldn't sell insurance to banks when lending to other banks to protect against losses. insurance fees collected by the FDIC would be used to reduce losses from bank failures. essentially, the FDIC would not only handle insuring individual accounts, but also larger institutional entities. perhaps this idea could be used to deal with the credit swap mess while that is being sorted out. dunno ... i'm not really into the expansion of institutional power, unless it improves efficiency and gov't as a mechanism, so i'm very leery of what is going on right now. -_-
Email It
|
Print It
|
Flag as Offensive
Sign Up to Post Your Comments
Sign Up to Post Your Comments
Please take a few seconds to sign up, then you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, create your own blog and more! If you are already registered,
click here
.
Need an account?
Login
Login
Your Email:
Password:
Get Your Password
|
Register
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (
*
) are required.
Salutation:
Mr.
Mrs.
Ms.
Miss.
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
AE
Alabama
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
District of Columbia
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Puerto Rico
Rhode Island
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming
*
Zip:
*
Townhall Daily Alert
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
Townhall.com Spotlight
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.