Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons

Comment on: Reformation Man

Dinosaur Soft Tissue Proves Geologic Column a Fraud

3 Comments

There is a difference between

proof and indication. And since the theory of evolution is very broad, it would be a mistake to jump to conclusions and say all of it has been proven wrong.

That there is a survival of the fittest and natural selection is well established and shows that evolution, with regards to changes in a species, has many valid points.

The problem is when people try to apply evolution to answer questions like how did life begin and how did we get all of the different species. There, either evolution has no answer or it has many invalid points.

the Word

The world (and sadly the church) is full of people that believe the Bible-just a little bit, the parts they think they understand and if it doesn't conflict with what they think they know.

They are lost, who deny the Word.


Paul said to be followers of him(1 Cor 11:1), as he also follows Christ; we can follow those who follow Christ, but when their ways and beliefs deviate from the "sure word of prophesy" Peter spoke of (2 Peter 1:19), then we had better side with the Word (Deut 13:1-4).

Stop the nonsense…


C5 you have been here long enough to know what is meant by darwinite fraud and the geologic column. They use the theory of micro-evolution to explain the column and then use the column to prove evolution. Now the circular reasoning has been exposed by their own people.

If their explanation of the column is exposed as fraud, if the column is indeed not evidence of micro-evolution, but a recent catastrophic flood event, then the whole theory of the evolution of everything must fall and take its place in the trash heap of history of vain philosophies that oppose the word of the self-revealed God.