Fairness Doctrine

Gunny may have been using sarcasm too, I haven't read what you read from him on this.

Anyway, I wrote along the same lines you are here on my blog, planning to put together a revised version since mine is a little long and I see a relation to a variety of other liberal aspects:

http://toddy.blogtownhall.com/2008/11/08/fairness_doctrine, _eschelon,__obama.thtml

I'll probably edit the original and cut out what seems out of place. But for what applies to the fairness doctrine I am right with ya there.

Caday5 couldn't get that idea though his skull. It was in the comments that the idea got brought up, so GunnyG wrote a great piece but it wasn't about the fairness doctrine.

Ill check out your post as well.

are a worthless bunch. They try to get around the Constitutionality by arguing that the radio bands are owned by the government, and that the gov't therefore has a right to regulate what is put out on "it's" airwaves. BS.

As for arguing with caday5: It's not even worth it. Personally, I think he does understand, but fails to acknowledge. His goal is not to make argue logically, but to confuse and distort the issues. I've seen him claim to be a "Christian Conservative" just to try and confuse someone, when he clearly is a communist. I find it's better to just smack him...

I slightly disagree with Redhead on caday5. I am starting to just ignore him. It is not worth the trouble to argue with him. HE AIN"T CHANGING.

They can try, but unless they can prove that the government creates the radio bands, they have nothing.

Yea, I think I have gotten that. The guy is worthless. Ill probably take Gray Ghosts advice and just ignore him. lol. Its just so hard to let him lie his way through things.