If there wasn't McCarthy in the US, we would probably hug with both hands either Stalinism either Fascism.
Recently i read a very intersting article, right here on townhall.com by Ann Coluter
http://www.townhall.com/columnists/AnnCoulter/2003/08/07/when_good_historians_go_badwhich i believe has very tight connections with the article that you mentoined.
As the matter of fact, she specifically refers to Arnold Beichman and his perception of McCarthy by strongly defending the fact, that if there was no McCarthy, America would probably be one of the communist countries (which we all know how they are operate in the post-communist period - terrible) by now and we should be thankful to McCarthy. Which i agree totaly with her.
However there were and still are many speculations about McCarthy's intervention in the US diplomacy and selecting the communists and the 'communists'.
I did a research regarding to that, and something similar to your fact-checking of the article, on my article by Ann Coulter, and I came up with a few things.
* · There are many publications and columns praising and blaming Ann Coulter for her lack of knowledge and facts regarding to Joe McCarthy and McCarthyism. Obviously Ann devoted the whole chapter in her book “Treason” to McCarthy himself, and about the rest of the book to McCarthyism and insulting the liberals how they were cooperating with Nazis and Soviets during the World War II approximately until Stalin’s death in 1953. Which can be seen right here:
http://hnn.us/articles/1554.htmlhttp://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=8793I personally didn’t get a chance to read her book “Treason”, but I took it into consideration after this article of her that I have read.
* It is still not clear if the people blamed that they were cooperating with communists by McCarthy were really doing that, or they are falsely announced as Soviet spies. Ann Coulter is convinced that there is no single person harmed by McCarthy’s investigation. While according to
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joe_mccarthy#Ongoing_debate those people that were "correctly identified by McCarthy”, were actually part of the conspiracy that is “questionable or demonstrably incorrect”. So, there is no such a list that clearly states were the people that McCarthy blamed as communist ‘comrades’ in US Government really that or not.
* · According to
http://writing.upenn.edu/~afilreis/50s/clubb-obit.html Edmund Clubb was not ‘reddish’ neither working against US Government. Mc Carthy suspected that the reports Mr. Clubb was bringing from China about China’s communist system were actually pro-communist. And they actually weren’t. Clubb was just saying that the communism might start spreading toward the west. He also said that ‘the communists were strong and popular in the regions they ruled’. Of course they were! The people who were ruled by the communists were not aware of other political system with which the communism could be compared to. So they weren’t actually available at all to compare communism with some other system because they couldn’t see any other system.
* · John Paton Davies, member of the China Hands
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/China_Hands together with Edmund Clubb, was not actually guilty for doing his job. Although nine accusations failed to prove Davies’s guilt, McCarthy was still persistent in doing so.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_P._Davies (check ‘Accusations and Dismisal’ section). He was one of the best experts on China from before, during and after the WWII. Davies ‘he advocated US relations with Communist China to forestall a Soviet takeover’, but there is no clear evidence that he was one of the ‘comrades’.
So far there are really only two people that could be misatkenly called communists, although Mr. Davies is still a conspiracy. But, who knows how many more of them could be inside the US that McCarthy didn't revealed. And what would happend if nobody came to that idea? Would America be a communist country?