Talk Radio:
Bill Bennett
Mike Gallagher
Dennis Prager
Michael Medved
Hugh Hewitt
BREAKING NEWS
Register
|
Sign In
Search
SIGN UP NOW!
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
Login
|
What's Hot
Townhall Daily Alert
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
White House & Capitol Report
Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
Daily Conservative Cartoon
Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Columnists
|
News
|
Video
|
Podcasts
|
Photos
|
Cartoons
|
Blog
|
Your Blogs
|
Issues
|
Get Magazine
|
Finance
What’s Hot
|
Your Blogs Directory
|
Create Your Own Blog
|
Featured Talk Radio Calls
Comment on:
From My Desk
Fixing the Government
3 Comments
Wednesday, October, 18, 2006 5:17 PM
JDComments
writes:
Deck Chairs on the Titanic
With all due respect, while you make reasonable arguments, the truth is the problem with Big Government is it seeks to do TOO MUCH, and no rearranging of the organization chart, or assignment of functions is going to change that. Ever since the Depression, we have been abdicating more and more responsibilities to Big Brother, and ignored the fact that Government is probably the most inefficient means to handle almost any problem. It is not subject to the laws of economics [need more money- tax or borrow!], and electoral politics means it will always pander to constituencies with no regard for overall effectiveness. In short, government is a necessary evil for things like national defense and interstate trade, but we have allowed it to begin the dominant institution in our country,and then wonder why it is ineffective. Conservatism is all about limiting government, not reorganizing it, because that is a futile endeavor.
Email It
|
Print It
|
Flag as Offensive
Wednesday, October, 18, 2006 5:26 PM
JDComments
writes:
Deck Chairs on the Titanic
With all due respect, while you make reasonable arguments, the truth is the problem with Big Government is it seeks to do TOO MUCH, and no rearranging of the organization chart, or assignment of functions is going to change that. Ever since the Depression, we have been abdicating more and more responsibilities to Big Brother, and ignored the fact that Government is probably the most inefficient means to handle almost any problem. It is not subject to the laws of economics [need more money- tax or borrow!], and electoral politics means it will always pander to constituencies with no regard for overall effectiveness. In short, government is a necessary evil for things like national defense and interstate trade, but we have allowed it to begin the dominant institution in our country,and then wonder why this patronage spewing, popularity craving , short sighted collection of bureaucrats and politicians is ineffective. Conservatism is all about limiting government, not reorganizing it, because that is a futile endeavor which inevitably leads to more government, and a bigger problem.
Email It
|
Print It
|
Flag as Offensive
Wednesday, December, 06, 2006 3:19 AM
Keith Lehman
writes:
Deck Chairs on the Titanic
Yes, the concept of Big Government is to do too much -- but the Big Picture is this:
Too many agencies in the government comes from the Big Government mentality. Lessen the scope and size of government requires it to reduce the need for so many departments, agencies, et cetera. Government is more efficient if it is smaller in size and not just the fact that it concerns itself with things that are not written in the Constitution. And it is the American people who have encouraged those in government to create new social programs (and along with that more departments and agencies to oversee it) by continually expecting the government to do things we can do ourselves or within the realm of charitable organizations.
Therefore, when reducing the scope of government, the size or less of a need for so many agencies/departments is also required. For example, the Faith Initiative policy -- that created an office of people running the program. Get rid of the program, yes, but at the same time it would require to also get rid of the bureaucratic entity that establishes and maintains the program -- thus, it is inevitable that the government would not only reduce in the concept of intrusive policies, but will also become smaller in physical size and requiring less people to maintain those entities that operate those agencies and their programs.
Email It
|
Print It
|
Flag as Offensive
Sign Up to Post Your Comments
Sign Up to Post Your Comments
Please take a few seconds to sign up, then you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, create your own blog and more! If you are already registered,
click here
.
Need an account?
Login
Login
Your Email:
Password:
Get Your Password
|
Register
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (
*
) are required.
Salutation:
Mr.
Mrs.
Ms.
Miss.
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
AE
Alabama
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
District of Columbia
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Puerto Rico
Rhode Island
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming
*
Zip:
*
Townhall Daily Alert
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
Townhall.com Spotlight
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.