Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons

Comment on: ANTI-LIBERAL ZONE

MY HATE MAIL...

78 Comments

So....

First guy's not a racist is he? Noooooo. He just hates whites. But he's apparently not white, so he's not racist.
He reads your blog every day? If he hates you so much, he must be a glutton for punishment.

Last guy is a piece of work.
Talk about hateful. Oh, but like the first non-racist, he's not hateful you are. Right?

Nice spelling losers!
Ooops! I'd better spell that the way they would so they'll understand.....

Nise spelin loosers!

beachmom

I was laughing pretty hard reading them. It's evident that liberals really ARE stupid and dumbed down.

My favorite definition

of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again, but expecting a different result.

Lord, help us if this is the mentality of Obama voters. How many of these nidiots will it take to get their sum total IQ into double digits. You can't help but laugh, then shake your head realizing they ARE serious. Yikes!!!!!

If I may hijack your thread, Gunny, I received an e-mail from Congressman Mike Conaway soliciting input for the GOP platform. Not being an internet god, I'll just put the address dow:

mikeconaway.com/platform

now is your chance to have input into how/what we think. The first topic is energy. Please, inundate him with your thoughts.

Thanks, Gunny, I appreciate this sight and your efforts.
Val Weiss

MD/MG

I'll check that out and put some input down for the GOP. I am sure that they're getting a tidal wave of it! haha.

Gunny,

that's why I posted here. I figured with as much as we whine and complain, NOW we better put up or zip our lips [uh, fingers?]
Val

Gunny

IMO, your posts have too little substance to cause a strong reaction. Your posts are educational only in that they show how you feel about things.

You gotta love how J saved his best

insult for last, calling you a F**GGOT. Just another typical example of liberal tolerance and open-mindedness I guess.

Let's invent a game called spot the bigot.

Person A is a raving moonbat who votes for same-sex marriage and the whole nine yards because it p*sses off 'conservatives', probably attends Gay Pride Day, but when there's no homos around starts hurling around F**GGOT as a four-letter word insult.

Person B opposes same-sex marriage using rational argument, has never called anyone a F**GGOT as an insult, and on a personal level is on perfectly respectful and courteous terms with the few gay people at work.

Spot the bigot.

caday5

Those are the thoughts of your fellow comrades...comrade.

philosophocon

As I stated earlier, I was laughing pretty hard.

Almost as hard as O-Vomit's plan to inflate our tires and get a tune up to save 70 million gallons of gas!

BWAHAHAHHHAHAHAHAHHAHHHHAHHAHAHAHAHA!

caday5

BTW, I've NEVER posted any facts here have I? Get checked ASAP. I think your last brain cell just died from loneliness.

Geeze Gunny, your hate mail is

almost as good as Glenn Beck's... And that's saying something!

I have to confess, I do LOVE it when you find that last liberal nerve, and JUMP on it... LOL

Gunny

You are all about venting and insulting and that is suppose to be impressive? I know conservatives who seriously think about things and have good things to say but you seem to hide part of yourself here. Anyway, vent on.

caday

"For the most part, ngtty simply likes to insult those he disagrees with. That pretty much sums up the contents of his notes on my blog."

Was that not intended as an insult, Pot?

As I said, I'm insulted by almost everything Gunny posts - do I not have the right to throw it back - like you?

ngtty

It simply was an observation of your behavior. Our disagreement is about voting for Nader and you have not stopped insulting me over that. So no, I am insulting you but I am stating how you behave. I am not making a judgment on your logic or intelligence. I am simply saying how you respond to me who was trying to avoid insulting you.

Gunny

What's that e-mail address again? "libsmustdie..something..something"

I'm curious if the government has ever looked into your electronic persona. It seems like they should. Are you a terrorist? You really sound like one.

And

You got some nasty mail there. I was having a hard time reading it. Nice typos!

The best of the best really needs to get a life. Are you an SUV gas guzzling environment killing...oh give me a break.

They were pretty good.

Gunny

Nice to see that our prison system is teaching the inmates how to use computers. Now if they would teach them spelling and grammar you might get a well written response.

HaHa

Insane,ignorant slobering trolls displaying all the class I've come to expect.

Geez

Now I feel neglected and inadequate. I'm not getting that kinda mail.

MD/MG, I'm gonna go to that site and give them a link to our American Tradition Platform from my Swamp. Viva la revolution!

Now Those Are Funny

Which ones are from ngtty and c5?

Gunny

A man's enemies speak volumes for his character. I am proud of the enemies I have managed to make in my front of the battle against godless commies. I'm sure you are too.

dsgonzale6 wrote: "As a moderate Democrat, I'd rather slit my wrists than vote for McCain."

Yes, of course, all the "moderate" people I know go around talking about slitting their wrists.


This is the kind of "stable" individual that makes up the Obama base.

Gunny

Great stuff,looks like you are SPOT-ON target here. As you have stated,you know you are over it when they shoot at you. Looks like some PRIME candidates for AHOTY. Carry on!!

I, for one, am especially impressed


by the literacy level of your "fans".

I have to wonder if any went further than, say, third grade.

Apologies to Foxworthy

Are Libs Smarter Than A Fifth Grader?

uh...nope!

Dear GunnyG

I, too, receive occasional glowing attributes such as yours! (You should have seen an email I got yesterday from the distribution boss of a sleazy Hollywood outfit!) These I hold close to my bosom for the warmth they engender!!

As you say, when you get mail like that, you know that you're doing your duty as a citizen in the cause of right. As I'VE always said: You can judge the worth of a cause by the worth of its adherents. By that standard, decent, patriotic Americans still stand on the rock beneath which our adversaries dwell.

Love ya cause you ain't pc

Keep doing the Lord's work.

When the flak gets heavy...

You know you are over the target. I look forward to more sorties. Watching the Gunny go Linebacker II on the libs amuses me.

Gunny, I've got a question...

Which would be worse...

Four years of a Pelosi Congress, Reid Senate, and John McCain caving in to them (as seems to be his way, earning hom the title of a GOP "maverick"), or

Two years of a Pelosi Congress, Reid Senate, and Obama going along with them, followed by a mid-term upheaval that results in some fresh new GOP blood taking back the Congress?

History repeats itself. Congress is where the real power lies, regardless of how much we heap either credit or blame on the president. Just as Clinton's first two years shocked the nation and awoke Conservatism from its six year nap, so too would two years of an Obama Nation, in the end, prove beneficial.

You don't notice a slow descent, but a quick fall scares the Hell out of you.

For more conversation on this point, go to:

theuseofreason.blogtownhall.com

Palmer....amen, pard.


That's exactly the point I've been driving on for well over a year, now, back when it looked like uber-RINO Giuliani was going to be annointed.

Don't bother me with the facts...

...I've already made up my mind. (Lefty Creed)

In the insular world of the left any opinion that differs from theirs is 'hate speech'. These are the people who hope to administer a "fairness doctrine".
If you think Gunny's mail writers are the fringe listen to a couple of hours of Air America or the Stephanie Miller Show. They fit right in to the lefty mainstream.

The guy who reads your blog everyday, though he vehemetly disagrees with your view point reminds me of the old saw about the preacher who watched a naughty film 23 times and determined that it was indeed pornographic.

3rd (brown) eye

Yeah, right. "Lefty creed" to have made up your mind and stick to your stupid decision?? How about NO. That sounds an awful lot like Bush to me - is he a lefty?

Lefties' problem is not being able to reach a consensus. But I think nazi neocons like you are SOL this time since even the uber-liberals may be smart enough to see what a shame it would be to let John McCain become the next president.

Strap on a set and vote for Obama - he can't be any worse that Bush and that darn fickle (senile) liberal McCain. "uhh, who was that we just bombed?"

ngtty

The character of certain men elevates the office of the president. Reagan and W have that kind of character.
Men of lesser character are elevated by the office. Clinton, Gore, Obama, Kerry, McCain are such men.

Humility is an indicator of one type and chutzpah indicates the other.

One type is willing to sacrifice his reputation for what is right, the other sacrifices what is right for what is popular.

Right now, you like Obama because he's selling what you're buying. This too shall pass.

Liberals need conservatives, in order to be happy. Someone has to be the reason for the world's ills. When we are gone, they will blame someone else. Maybe you will be in the "out" crowd then, who knows?

Good luck, you need it.

KenUSA

I like your premise about character elevating the office though I have to disagree with your examples.

Bush's dilemma is that he cannot distinguish when it is principled to listen to others and change course from when it is principled to stay the course.

As for Reagan, I like what Chomsky said when he said that the best you can say about Reagan is that he did not know. His Central American policies were criminal and immoral.

You will be glad to know that Chomsky has some harsher criticisms for Clinton than he does for Bush. For example, when he compared the two, he said:

"The Bush doctrine itself, the doctrine of preventive war - you know, brazen contempt for our allies and so on - is an interesting example. The doctrine, however, was not new. Clinton's doctrine was even worse, taken literally. Clinton's doctrine officially was that the United States has the right to use force to protect access to markets and resources, and that's more extreme than the Bush doctrine. But the Clinton administration presented it politely, quietly, not in a way that would alienate our allies. The Europeans couldn't pretend they didn't hear it - of course they knew it and, in fact, European leaders probably approved of it. But the arrogance, brazenness, extremism, and ultra-nationalism of the Bush administration did offend the mainstream center in the United States and Europe. So, there's a more polite way of following the same policies."

That was from http://www.zcommunications.org/znet/viewArticle/18257

Dear Caddy

I keep telling you: Quoting a certifiable left wing wacko/elitist like Noam Chomsky reduces your credibility to rock-bottom. Stick to Che and Mao.

Steve

Chomsky was right in 1982 when he said that the Afghan freedom fighters, including Bin Laden, were going to conduct atrocities of their own.

Chomsky was right in 2002 when he said that world terrorism would increase and that there would be a humanitarian disaster in Iraq if we invaded (State Dept and report by Bergen and Cruickshank reports confirmed the terrorism part, 4.7 million displaced people is partial confirmation of the humanitarian disaster).

You might agree with Chomsky's analysis of Barack Obama. He simply calls Barack a blank slate with whom people associate what they want to associate.

I generally take comments like yours about Chomsky as reflecting more on the writer than the person being written about. Without looking at any detail, you make a broad sweeping statement purely to discredit him and what he has to say rather than to logically engage what he said. That is not impressive.

If you want to intelligently discuss Chomsky, then give the specifics as to why you think he is wrong.

Hey

I think I resemble at least one of those remarks. They can call us what they like and osama obama(barry) bin ladin and his ilk can kiss my big fat white a__. Keep bashin those libs Gunny.

NGTTY

libsmustdie...

This is not a true statement? We ALL die. Sorry if it offended you.







Not really.

Sue

They failed to mention that I'm a red-meat eating, BBQ-using, knuckledragger! haha

KenUSA

As Churchill stated: "Be proud of having enemies. It means that you stood for something once."

Steve

When they scream the loudest, it's BOMBS AWAY!

theoilpatchplug

And to you as well. God hates commies.

Waarthog

Thanks for the kudos. I'm on the road right now but will work up Linebacker II ASAP!

Full bomb load!

CL Palmer

Good essay on your blog and thanks for stopping by.

The question is, can we SURVIVE O-Vomit as a nation? If so, it'll destroy the Dhimmicrat Party, which MAY be worth four bad years.

HarryJ

HAHA!

Inmates? More like rabid chimps pounding their keyboards as they screeched in anger.

Love it; Libs are great

entertainment, they are so dense. they actually believe the nonsense they spew and can't be swayed with facts or common sense. It's not hard to understand; they don't have brains in their heads; they have bricks.

Hillarious post. Keep it up, Gunny

Gunny

So your friends are joining in the "vent off". That is without facts or logic, you make accusations against liberals and then congratulate each other. But what have you proved? Party on.

I'm over the Target

NGTTY bleats
"But I think nazi neocons like you..."
and starts out with "Third (Brown) Eye. (Yes I get the implication)

NGTTY proves Gunny's point with these inaccurate but demeaning comments. When confronted with a few facts the response is name calling with a negative tone. Somehow that doesn't lead to converts to the leftist cause. Wonder why?

A Neocon by definition is a 'new conservative.' I'm a lifelong conservative, nothing new about that. And Nazi??? That is too stupid to even respond to.

Dear Caddy

Chomsky, like most liberal pundits, is given to sweeping statements that allow for much "wiggle room" to adjust for future developments. In the two instances you mentioned, he was right. However, he was right for the wrong reasons. Nor was he the "lone guru" in predicting this.

Afghan resistance fighters against the Soviet Union were a highly variagated bunch, united only by their antagonism to a foreign invasion. They always have been. We aided them because the main objective was to weaken and, eventually, bring down the USSR. It worked. That radical elements, already well established throughout the Moslem world, would take later advantage of this was a given. We were dealing with the greater threat as it then existed.

For that reason, also, we assisted Saddam's Iraq against Iran... again, knowing full well that Saddam was a future adversary. He was merely the lesser one at the moment. When, after Iran's defeat, he used his army to annex Kuwait and acquired a WMD arsenal (with the intent of expanding it into the nuclear department) he then became the greater adversary.

Unless one is prepared to impose a world empire by force, Roman-style, the only alternative is to try and play off the bad guys one against the other as much as you can. When that fails, you must be prepared to act. And, when they attack you directly, you MUST act- directly and forcibly.

Bush understood this. Chomsky did not. Chomsky is a prattering and pedantic progressive who's just clever enough to sell his hackneyed "wisdom" to the quiche crowd and make an personally profitable impression.

Such grammar!


NEA has pretty well succeeded.
Of course if you respect our English language then you are a racist.

I cannot believe not only the stupidity of these
idiots but they are not even embarrassed by their displayed ignorance and stupidity.

Steve

If anyone is acting like a hack it is you. For example, why don't you list the people predicting that the foreign fighters we were moving into Afghanistan in the early 80's would commit their own atrocities and indicate when they said it.

I can tell you who made the predictions that Chomsky made in 2002 regarding our invasion of Iraq. The NIC was predicting an increase in terrorism while humanitarian organizations were predicting the humanitarian disaster. Here, Chomsky simply alerted those who listened what was being said.

One of your problems is that because Chomsky is from the other side, you have to discredit him. That is the typical conservative response. Another one of your problems is that Chomsky is right more often than he is wrong. Too bad.

So try discussing issues rather than slamming people and maybe, just maybe, you might contribute to the discussion. Otherwise, you are just another hack who cares more about discrediting others than discussing issues.

Buck

The Teacher's Union has succeeded above their wildest dreams. Evidently, they failed to think it through, seeing as how the dumba** youth of today will, GOD FORBID, be tomorrow's leaders.

dear gunny g:

i am a published writer (although i never mention it unless it actually lends something to the conversation), and i just want to mention that your hate mail has been written by illiterate, ignorant, self-absorbed, ideologically-driven but simultaneously mindless
ciphers. please continue to publish it, though, as it provides us all with a catharctic experience, much like the catharsis that occurs when hillary tries to scuttle obama's sinking ship at the convention. or maybe she's just setting the stage for 2012. anyway, i've appreciated the gunny catharsis.

Dear Caddy

You're attributing your own predelictions (and Chomsky's, by the way) to me. It's a common liberal ploy. I cast a wary eye on a number of liberal pundits because they do exactly the same things you accuse me of. I judge people by their words and deeds. When, over time, I see a pattern develop, then I know what to expect in the future.

Chomsky's an elitist liberal droner who, for reasons of ego and anti-American bias, plays fast and loose with facts and figures to create and artificial universe centered around himself. There are any number of those out there. There always have been. Nor are they all liberals. Liberals, however, predominate in the field as they, being necessarily secularists, already center their universe around themselves (not God) and therefore can manipulate its postulates to suit themselves.

There's my outlook. If that constitutes "slamming" in your eyes, so be it.

I, too, have my biases... which I readily admit. I'm biased (but not prejudiced) in favor of the Christian Creed and the Biblical Word of God. It's called Faith. I'm biased (but not prejudiced) in favor of my country, its best interests and its highest traditions of citizenship and decency... which I continuously propound. It's called patriotism. Naturally, I have little patience with those who oppose what I consider to be the basic values of civilization and do so in a disingenuous manner.

beltway girl

No problem, my pleasure. The main point here is to show fellow conservatives that liberals are ANYTHING but tolerant AND, that when they hurl moonbat venom and angst at you, then you KNOW that you're hitting home in your attacks on their fouled ideology and beliefs.

Gunny

compare our writings and see who hurls more venom

caday5

As I hurl venom, I hurl facts. You just hurl...

Gunny

What facts have you hurled?

"What Facts Have You Hurled?"

,asked Admiral Lutjens dismissively of the British... as the Bismarck sank beneath him.

caday5

Feel free to go back through my blog pages. When I write something definitive, I post a link(s) back to my source material.

I'll post a recent link that I noted that you were conspicuously ABSENT on.

http://noliberalspin.blogtownhall.com/2008/07/20/how_the_li berals_have_screwed_us_with_the_gas_tax.thtml

Here's one where I list the various BS librag headlines concerning globull cooling/warmings since 1890.

http://noliberalspin.blogtownhall.com/2008/07/17/liar!_liar !_pants_on_fire!.thtml

But go ahead and keep your head up your a**, no doubt it's comforting to you if a wee bit confining.

Steve

In this thread, the first fact I pointed out is that for the most point, this is a venting blog. No significant facts about liberals are posted here and in fact, neoliberal politicians like Obama are often wrongly confused with communists because people here have trouble making distinctions.

Other points I have brought up:

1. That our invasion of Iraq was in violation of both the UN charter and the Nuremberg principles. In fact, we gave the same defense for invading Iraq that the Nazis gave for their war crimes: anticipatory self-defense.

2. Speaking of Iraq, I have cited previous polls that have stated that since 2005, the Iraqi people want us to leave--the 2005 poll that indicated that was a British defense poll. I have also stated that the majority of Iraqis oppose the privatization of their oil resources with US companies controlling their resources. In fact, the Parliament opposed this privatization too.

3. Speaking of Iraq, I said that it was predicted that invasion would cause an increase in terrorism--verified by State dept and other stats--and that a humanitarian disaster would result from the invasion. I have said that Bush was also warned of sectarian violence if the invasion took place.

4. Speaking of the US, I cited historian Chalmers Johnson's observation that like other empires, the US would suffer in the following 4 ways:

1. a permanent state of war
2. a stronger systematic effort at spreading disinformation
3. a weakening of Constitutional Rights
4. bankruptcy

I cited these benchmarks because of what Johnson observed in other empires and what we are experiencing now.

On the other hand, I understand the mindset of most conservatives. They are employing a WWII triumphalism mindset for understandable reasons. But regardless of the reasons, this mindset is more sabotaging than serving us.

Gunny

I will reread those links asap. But you also have to understand that I am not in agreement with the republican-lite Democratic party. That part is just way too conservative and confusing them with the left shows either an unwillingness to distinguish between them or an inability to.

Steve

Good post on Chumpsky. He's been exposed as a liar and a fraud, fit for consumption by morons and liberals only, who drool over his every word.

Dear Caddy

1. Wrong

2. That was 2005.

3. The terrorism was already there. That's why we are.

4. Who the hell is Chalmers Johnson?

You are right Gunny

When we receive hate mail, we know that we are doing something right. And you my friend, are as always at the forefront of the fight.

I was away for a bit but I am back. If you have the chance, check out my latest post.

Steve

our's or European colonialism preceded any terrorism. It's called history and Chalmers Johnson was a good enough historian to be used as a consultant for the CIA. BTW, what you also missed was the statement that since the invasion of Iraq, we have seen a spike in world terrorism even when you exclude the hotspots of Iraq and Afghanistan.

Saying wrong does not prove a point. The UN charter explicitly condemns the use of force or even the threat of the use of force. And since our war against Iraq was a preventive war, there was no imminent attack or even threat according to our own intelligence, then yes, we violated the Nuremberg principles for the same reasons that the Nazis employed.

And public opposition to our presence has been against our occupation since 2005.

Dear Caddy

Well, your "UN Resolution" has worked pretty well, hasn't it? Savages, dictators and rogue nations abound and attack civilization in every way they can. Either we resist... or we die. That's simple enough to understand when you take the blinders off. All of the legalistic jargon and politics-of-defeat gimmickry can't alter that fact. Holding up any of the myriad (and worthless) resolutions from that likewise worthless and corrupt organization is sheer, suicidal folly. It's the international equivalent of a "Gun-Free Zone" sign on a school campus. All it serves to do is attract the savages with the subliminal message of "easy pickin's inside".

Steve

How can UN resolutions work when the most powerful and the most "enlightened" ignore them (US and Israel)?

caday (chomsky) 5

Let me get this right...you quoted/referenced chom (wait - I don't want to see that name again) c-----y about 50 freakin' times. Are you also such a sheep that you'll start bleating Gunny's tunes and praises soon too?

Still stuck on the aptly named Ralph?



Dear Caddy

The big problem is that America and Israel are about the only countries that do. That's how the weasels of the world (not to mention the terrorists) have taken such advantage of us all this time... while we foot the bill! The United Nations has long since become a tool of America's and civilization's enemies. The time has long been due for us to disavow the UN and evict them from our shores. They are nothing but an enemy within.

Dear Nigitty

For once, we agree on something. From now on, every time Caddy adds Chompsky's name into the equation, I'm going to post a counter-quote from Ann Coulter.

Steve

Again, Israel violated far more UN resolutions than Saddamn. The US has ignored its share of international laws. Our invasion of Iraq and our threats against Iran are violations of the UN Charter.

The problem is when the self-proclaimed most "democratic" and "enlightened" nations flaunt UN resolutions and international law for self-interests, how can we expect any other nation to follow.

What results is not a rule by law where every nation is judged by the same standard, but a rule by force where we play a permanent game of King Of the Hill with more and more players packing heat (WMDs).

Finally, what amuses me is the concern that you and ngtty have over my citing Chomsky. If what I am citing is factually incorrect, then what is most important are the assertions, not the source. But if who I am citing is factually correct, then the person I am citing is equally irrelevant.

And Steve, it doesn't bother me if you cite Coulter or anyone else. What is important is the degree to which what we are asserting is true. As for ngtty, he simply looks for the first opportunity to insult people.

racist steve

but Coulter is just a venomous whore - at least c----y's got some cred.

You Asked For It!

"There are only two choices with savages: Fight or run. Democrats always want to run, but they dress it up with meaningless catchphrases like "diplomacy", "detente", "multilateral engagement", "multilateral diplomacy", "containment" and "going to the UN"."- Ann Coulter

Dear Caddy: I only wish we did ignore the UN the way the savages consistantly do. If we had, the savagry problem would have likely been "contained" long since. Just another reason to kick 'em out of New York.

Dear Nigitty: Such language!!

gay racist steve

The venomous whore comes through so much clearer in your note. Thanks so much.

Coulter has nothing but hate to espouse - are you trying to make some kind of point by quoting it?

Dear Nigitty

Yep. Ann just throws it back in the faces of liberals the way they throw it in ours. The difference is, she does so with more style and far more truth.

"As with all liberal behavior tropes, you could tell what they were up to by what they accused conservatives of. Liberals can't help projecting their own malevolence onto others."