Gay Marriage Rescues Heterosexual Divorce

Yes, it will be interesting to see what happens. I predict that heterosexual men will still be seen as the worst villain.

http://walrus.blogtownhall.com/2008/05/15/california_goes_f or_chuck_and_larry.thtml

John McCain is the only cannidate that will fufill our presidents war on islam. What we need in these endtimes is a good strong
anti-libaral, non-hippie who holds true to the word of our lord. I really hope WHEN McCain becomes president he lives up to the
republican platform and ends abortion, criminalizes gay sex and marrage and stops de-regulashion. We need to invade andor
nuke iran and all these terriorists before its too late. This is exacly what the bible pridected would happen if the world fell
away from his word. Armogeddon is close at hand we must stop them as a global force and unite christians and live as the
word would tell us. and wage war against the non-beilevers and democarats and libarals.

Here's my predicition: when a Judge is faced with a same sex divorce with children, the criteria used will be to determine which of the two spouses played the traditional roles of mother and father, and then apply the standard rules.

Won't that be ironic?

...in openly and immediately admitting to being a ridiculously simplistic, irrational, unreasonable, emotionally motivated religious zealot, who is so simplistic that you self-contradict within two paragraphs.
I'm going to give you more credit than is probably due, and assume that you are married. It's obvious that you were once married, and got hosed in the divorce. But I digress. The one question that you have to answer in your stalwart campaign to ban homosexual Americans from marrying, raising children, and any and all other activities or states from which you wish to ban them, is this: How is the marriage of homosexuals, or even their raising of children going to negatively impact your heterosexual marriage or family unit, causing you and/or yours demonstrable loss or harm through force or fraud?
If you, or any of your fellow travelers can concoct a reasonable and rational reply to that, you might gain some converts.

Wow, Buzz speaking of 'simplistic' -- I'm not looking to convert you or anyone else.

I'm not sure why you're so angry; I posted my thoughts in a fair and honest way -- which, if you read them with less hatred in your eyes you'd see I'm not self-contradicting at all -- to which you can only seem to attack and condem.

Also speaking of simplistic, Buzz -- you totally missed the point of my rather straightforward post; adding to this your rather misguided attempt to dissect who and what I am by a 'simple' blog post on the internet shows me you're less about the message and more about the destruction of those with whom you don't agree. For your own edification, I have neither been married nor am married now; as far as the rest of your accusations I can only shrug with indifference; my post has obviously touched a wound in your soul for which I can only offer my sympathies.

Even still, every person has a right to his or her opinions and I gladly offer this space for their expression. Your ad hominem attacks, however, take away from the point and validity of your comment; in following your lead Buzz I'll 'simply' skip it.

I'll be keeping you and yours in my thoughts and prayers. Until then, Buzz, I wish you well.