What is a Christian and a Terrorist

B-rant scrawls: "But we still haven’t defined what it means to be Christian"

Who's "we"?

You must be conversing with that "stupid" person in the mirror, junior.

Looks like you took a wrong cyber turn on your way to the DK.

Beat it, your wasting valuable band-width Bhudda-boy.

So there it is... bhudda huh? A great writer once said that writing is like having a one sided conversation. We, is the fictional person I was talking to, the fictious mentally capable conservative who could think and type, not just regergitate and type the rhetoric of his people's party. And you accuse us (this time I mean the non-neo-nazi-ultra-conservative) of being communist.

So senior, luckily, you'll die off (soon) and then we (the people who think as I) will run the country, and we can erase the memory of morons like you.

Should I start my next story with, come on boys and girls, let's take a journey? Would that have helped out the we I was talking about?

Oh, what is the DK? I know the BK, but don't really like fast food. I'm aware of the KKK, but don't like closeminded bigots (see the title of the blog if you missed it).

That's not the point for AGW advocates. Their point is control of your life--and radical changes to our economic system. Environmentalism was valuable at the beginning since their was no market force encouraging sensitive environmental behavior. But environmentalists have been wrong too often---wrong about nukes, wrong about ethanol, wrong about the new light bulbs, wrong about DDT(how many people have died as a result of malaria?), and wrong about Kyoto. I don't believe that even Al Gore would have signed something so flawed as Kyoto which would have moved a larger % of production to China and India thus increasing pollution instead of lowering it, but not signing it was one of the 3 best things George Bush did. And environmentalism went from a cause to a business to a religion--especially the AGW crowd. And like any religion, they fuss when criticized. Now some things need to be taken on faith, but the science is becoming so clear that to deny it makes these AGW zealots seem silly. The temperature has been stable for 10 years. That's the science. All these supposed experts want to keep the money flowing to their projects and their coffers so they go along and have the democrtaic party under their thumb. So conservation is good--no reason not to be careful stewards of God's creation. But common sense must prevail.

And let's agree that Al Gore is a collossal phony who had a carbon footprint the size of John Edwards mansion until he got caught. Why should anyone believe something when the guru doesn't?

that people on Townhall disagree with you and aren't all that polite. I too have my issues with some of the conservatives on here. That's why I don't visit all that often. They spend too much time criticising Robert or Hal or you when they should just ignore you once they find out that you are just spouting(actually copying and pasting) information that you haven't vetted or evaluauted. That's not very interesting. I used to visit daily, it's been months since I came here. I blame them for ruining the discussion. I also post infrequently at HuffPo. The language there is too vile for me however. That is one advantage of this site--their is a vile language filter. Some advice--unless you come up with some evaluations that make sense you are wasting your time here. You will change no one--most are already hardened anyway. And at almost all sites the majority displays an air of superiority and condescension. You need to be more pithy and less long winded to even get most people to read you.

is a relationship with Jesus Christ. There are certain required beliefs--the Virgin Birth, the humanity and divinity of Jesus, the sacrificial death on the cross for the sins of mankind, the victory over death available to us all through His resurrection, and believing that He is what He said He is--I am the way , the truth, the life, no one gets to the Father except through me. It is the least exclusive group in the world--available to all. Good works aren't required to be a Christian, but this personal relationship with Jesus should encourage you to want to glorify Him in your life. Our words and deeds should be motivated by a desire to honor and glorify and worship God. That's whwere many people, significantly famous preachers fall--they seem motivated to glorify themselves and fill their coffers. They can still be Christians, but need repentance and forgiveness.

There's the problem. You equivocate the actions of the Islamo-fascists with things Bush does that you don't agree with. Oklahoma City bombing was a terrorist act. But it wasn't Bush' fault. What happened? The terrorists were captured and punished. Few people cheered their acts. Islam has a much different reaction to terrorists acts against infidels--they celebrate. Bush' response to the possibility that Iraq had WMD was entirely appropriate. Not well executed in my opinion but appropriate. Clinton attempted negotiations with evil--Yasser Arafat--and was so naive and so anxious to have a legacy--that his support of Arafat's plan costs countless innocent Palestinian and Israeli women and children their lives. Even with that I don't consider Clinton a terrorist--but after his failure to stop these attacks Bush had to react more strongly to situations. In this conflict, the terrorists are easily recognized. They flew into the world trade center, they supprted terrorism in many ways and their followers celebrated. And you come across as close minded by the way. Without a lot of contemplation. I was correct in my assumption that you don't know who the terrorists are.

My reply here got lost. Suffice it to say that I think I was right inmy assumption that you don't know who the terrorists are. You seem to equivocate in the difference between OBL and George Bush. Your credibility is gone. But you don't seem to know what a Christian is either.

It didn't get lost--just slow to post. This site is horribly slow sometime.

You seem to define stupid as disagreeing with you and yet you don't offer much insight--just copy and pasted info and attacks. That is a liberal elite mindset--condescending, not enlightening.

Early 13th century--I just got around to looking it up.

In order for you to be Christian, you must first be chosen by God to be one.
If you are not one, you could never have any understanding of being one. you are blind. You can read the bible every day the rest of your life and will never understand it unless God reviels the meaning to you.