Talk Radio:
Bill Bennett
Mike Gallagher
Dennis Prager
Michael Medved
Hugh Hewitt
BREAKING NEWS
Register
|
Sign In
Search
SIGN UP NOW!
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
Login
|
What's Hot
Townhall Daily Alert
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
White House & Capitol Report
Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
Daily Conservative Cartoon
Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons
Columnists
|
News
|
Video
|
Podcasts
|
Photos
|
Cartoons
|
Blog
|
Your Blogs
|
Issues
|
Get Magazine
|
Finance
What’s Hot
|
Your Blogs Directory
|
Create Your Own Blog
|
Featured Talk Radio Calls
Comment on:
Iraq is not "Revenge of the Liberals"
Obama's plan to nickle and dime the electoral college.
2 Comments
Wednesday, September, 10, 2008 1:41 PM
BrianR
writes:
Rick, I like your blog!
Good stuff.
Yeah, this Electoral College nonsense has been kicking around for a while. Out here in Leftifornia, the plan keeps being proposed that the state's Electoral votes be determined by the national popular vote results.
Frankly, I don't think it will pass constitutional muster, and SCOTUS will shoot it down. Here's why.
The Constitution gives the states the power to determine their own method of allocating Electoral Delegates; but it also says, essentially, that it must be based on an election. Obviously, an internal state matter.
However, by allocating delegates based on the national popular outcome, residents of every OTHER state in the Union are determining that particular state's appointments. That's clearly unconstitutional.
Hell, the residents of State A could all abstain from voting -- not cast one single vote for anyone -- and still have a delegation sent to the Electoral College.
That would, in essence, allow states to outlaw elections, which is also, in and of itself, unconstitutional.
It'll never go anywhere.
The Dem/Libs keep floating this silly idea around. They STILL can't get over 2000.
"We wuz ROBBED!"
Hahahahaha.
Email It
|
Print It
|
Flag as Offensive
Wednesday, September, 10, 2008 1:44 PM
BrianR
writes:
PS, Rick
Now, proportional allocation of delegates is perfectly constitutional, and some states do it that way.
Frankly, I wish it were the norm. Here in Leftifornia, our 55 delegates are awarded en bloc (winner-take-all), and even though this state is still about 45% Republican, ALL 55 are awarded to the Dems, at least since Reagan. That's why the GOP doesn't even bother campaigning here.
It also disenfranchises the 45% of the state that's non-Dem. Why even bother voting at all after the primaries?
Email It
|
Print It
|
Flag as Offensive
Sign Up to Post Your Comments
Sign Up to Post Your Comments
Please take a few seconds to sign up, then you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, create your own blog and more! If you are already registered,
click here
.
Need an account?
Login
Login
Your Email:
Password:
Get Your Password
|
Register
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (
*
) are required.
Salutation:
Mr.
Mrs.
Ms.
Miss.
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
AE
Alabama
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
District of Columbia
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Puerto Rico
Rhode Island
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming
*
Zip:
*
Townhall Daily Alert
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
Townhall.com Spotlight
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.