Townhall.com, Where Your Opinion Counts
Talk Radio:   Bill Bennett   Mike Gallagher   Dennis Prager   Michael Medved   Hugh Hewitt   
BREAKING NEWS  LeftArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican   RightArrow - Townhall.com : Conservative, Political, Republican  
Columns, funnies & more in your inbox!
  • Check the boxes and send us your email address to receveive your free newsletter
  • Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
  • Townhall.com’s weekly inside scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes in the world of politics. When news breaks, we report.
  • Signup to receive the latest daily Townhall cartoons

Comment on: Americans Must Stand Up

Want to save the Planet??

4 Comments

You are 100% WRONG!!!!


First:
What? fluorescent bulbs are NEW? NO! CFL's are new? NO THEY ARE NOT! Only using as a direct replacement is NEW. BIG DEAL!

Second:
EPA points out the use of CFLs actually REDUCES OVERALL MERCURY in the environment, even locally.

The primary cause of mercury pollution is coal-fired power generation, which is responsible for 56 percent of the electricity used in the United States. According to the EPA, more energy-efficient incandescent bulbs lead to the emission of 10 milligrams of mercury, compared to 2.4 milligrams for a compact fluorescent bulb.

Compact fluorescents also contain substantially less mercury than other household devices. For example, a mercury thermometer contains 500 milligrams of the substance, compared to four in a fluorescent bulb. (Mercury thermometers have already been banned in many countries due to their mercury content.)

"There is less mercury emitted from these bulbs than from a coal-fired power plant that will continue to [power] incandescent [bulbs]," said Lester Brown, president of the Earth Policy Institute.

Third:
Plus you can get CFL's BRIGHTER than years ago, so that idiotic point is OFF. Actually BETTER color spectrum. NO PROBLEMS.

Fourth:
I pay less than $2.00 for CFL's equal to 100 Watts, using only 21.They last much longer that their 19th century distant relative, which wastes up to 95% of their electricity.


Lastly and even more important:
You are WAY BEHIND. LED's, NOT CFL's, are the "new bulbs". Lasting LONGER and using EVEN LESS energy than CFL's with NONE of your silly "talking point" SPEW.

You are 100% WRONG!!!!


First:
What? fluorescent bulbs are NEW? NO! CFL's are new? NO THEY ARE NOT! Only using as a direct replacement is NEW. BIG DEAL!

Second:
EPA points out the use of CFLs actually REDUCES OVERALL MERCURY in the environment, even locally.

The primary cause of mercury pollution is coal-fired power generation, which is responsible for 56 percent of the electricity used in the United States. According to the EPA, more energy-efficient incandescent bulbs lead to the emission of 10 milligrams of mercury, compared to 2.4 milligrams for a compact fluorescent bulb.

Compact fluorescents also contain substantially less mercury than other household devices. For example, a mercury thermometer contains 500 milligrams of the substance, compared to four in a fluorescent bulb. (Mercury thermometers have already been banned in many countries due to their mercury content.)

"There is less mercury emitted from these bulbs than from a coal-fired power plant that will continue to [power] incandescent [bulbs]," said Lester Brown, president of the Earth Policy Institute.

Third:
Plus you can get CFL's BRIGHTER than years ago, so that idiotic point is OFF. Actually BETTER color spectrum. NO PROBLEMS.

Fourth:
I pay less than $2.00 for CFL's equal to 100 Watts, using only 21.They last much longer that their 19th century distant relative, which wastes up to 95% of their electricity.


Lastly and even more important:
You are WAY BEHIND. LED's, NOT CFL's, are the "new bulbs". Lasting LONGER and using EVEN LESS energy than CFL's with NONE of your silly "talking point" SPEW.

You are 100% WRONG!!!!


First:
What? fluorescent bulbs are NEW? NO! CFL's are new? NO THEY ARE NOT! Only using as a direct replacement is NEW. BIG DEAL!

Second:
EPA points out the use of CFLs actually REDUCES OVERALL MERCURY in the environment, even locally.

The primary cause of mercury pollution is coal-fired power generation, which is responsible for 56 percent of the electricity used in the United States. According to the EPA, more energy-efficient incandescent bulbs lead to the emission of 10 milligrams of mercury, compared to 2.4 milligrams for a compact fluorescent bulb.

Compact fluorescents also contain substantially less mercury than other household devices. For example, a mercury thermometer contains 500 milligrams of the substance, compared to four in a fluorescent bulb. (Mercury thermometers have already been banned in many countries due to their mercury content.)

"There is less mercury emitted from these bulbs than from a coal-fired power plant that will continue to [power] incandescent [bulbs]," said Lester Brown, president of the Earth Policy Institute.

Third:
Plus you can get CFL's BRIGHTER than years ago, so that idiotic point is OFF. Actually BETTER color spectrum. NO PROBLEMS.

Fourth:
I pay less than $2.00 for CFL's equal to 100 Watts, using only 21.They last much longer that their 19th century distant relative, which wastes up to 95% of their electricity.


Lastly and even more important:
You are WAY BEHIND. LED's, NOT CFL's, are the "new bulbs". Lasting LONGER and using EVEN LESS energy than CFL's with NONE of your silly "talking point" SPEW.

You are 100% WRONG!!!!


First:
What? fluorescent bulbs are NEW? NO! CFL's are new? NO THEY ARE NOT! Only using as a direct replacement is NEW. BIG DEAL!

Second:
EPA points out the use of CFLs actually REDUCES OVERALL MERCURY in the environment, even locally.

The primary cause of mercury pollution is coal-fired power generation, which is responsible for 56 percent of the electricity used in the United States. According to the EPA, more energy-efficient incandescent bulbs lead to the emission of 10 milligrams of mercury, compared to 2.4 milligrams for a compact fluorescent bulb.

Compact fluorescents also contain substantially less mercury than other household devices. For example, a mercury thermometer contains 500 milligrams of the substance, compared to four in a fluorescent bulb. (Mercury thermometers have already been banned in many countries due to their mercury content.)

"There is less mercury emitted from these bulbs than from a coal-fired power plant that will continue to [power] incandescent [bulbs]," said Lester Brown, president of the Earth Policy Institute.

Third:
Plus you can get CFL's BRIGHTER than years ago, so that idiotic point is OFF. Actually BETTER color spectrum. NO PROBLEMS.

Fourth:
I pay less than $2.00 for CFL's equal to 100 Watts, using only 21.They last much longer that their 19th century distant relative, which wastes up to 95% of their electricity.


Lastly and even more important:
You are WAY BEHIND. LED's, NOT CFL's, are the "new bulbs". Lasting LONGER and using EVEN LESS energy than CFL's with NONE of your silly "talking point" SPEW.