If Guns Don't Kill Why Should IEDs?

… if you can’t see the difference between these two then… well… good luck to you. Your muddled logic will work for you only as long as you allow it.

What good does it do anybody else if it's only in your head.

I wonder what the percentages of guns used for purposes other than killing people and IEDs used for purposes other than killing people.

Can you predict the future intent of any driver on the road? Cars have been used to kill pepole. So are you advocating no guns, no IEDs and no motor vehicles?

No bath tubs in homes with a mother?

Ray

The only thing I'm advocating is truth instead of misdirection. Second amendment supporters can argue just as you have done, that's not lying. To say that guns don't kill is deceptive, and consciously so, at the very least.

The second thing I'm advocating is some balance. It seems as if there is a propaganda campaign under way with the assistance of the MSM. It's still the Shiite Iraqis who are using the IEDs. They have a choice. They have an intent. Let's not blame Iran for providing the IEDs, which the Shiites could choose not to use. You might say that there is a market for IEDs in Iraq and Iran is simply meeting consumers needs.