Mitt Romney Support Urged By Evangelical

He is a slick talking used car salesman who says whatever is most likely going to further his political career. Pro-abortion when he needed to be and now he is pro-life when he needs to be. No thanks on the Romney plee for Christian conservative votes. If he wins the nomination I stay home on election day. Go check with your lawyers on that Mitt!

Regardless of what so called leaders like DeMoss and Dobson have to say, ultimately the largely Christian conservative base of the Republican party will express their voices when they cast their votes (if they decide to show up). None of the current front runners are inspiring enough to galvanize and bring together that base right now.

However, there is one viable candidate who's position on important social issues has not wavered, and who also posseses the leadership experience, skills and ability to beat the democrats. It's not Mitt Romney.

I actually see Mike Huckabee suprising everyone over the next few months. Mike's positive message and vertical leadership is resonating with everyday Americans, and his campaign is picking up momentum. He not only has the most consistently conservative record on the issues Christians are concerned about, he also has the most compelling vision for America and the experienced leadership ability to bring people together and pull it off.

Meet Mike Here:

http://www.mikehuckabee.com/index.cfm?FuseAction=About.Home

Listen to Mike address some pastors, it's an inspirational message to say the least, send this link to every influential Christian you know:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gP0g4T-Egqk

Romney's intellect and personhood are vacuous, ready to be filled with whatever flows his way that may be expedient for his ambition. He is not a conservative by any stretch of the imagination. He is a pseudo-conservative, translated as "neo-conservative," short for big government, power-hungry, warmonger. He would "double Guantanamo" and ignore the Constitution in favor of consulting his lawyers regarding attacking Iran. The country wants no more war, Mitt...and Susan!!! Read our lips!!!

With at least 70% of the country against the war, there is no way that Romney can defeat Hillary. Voters who feel strongly about the war WILL select the lesser of two evils and vote for Hillary...GUARANTEED...albeit with a hope and a prayer, which will, no doubt, be all in vain. Romney, if given the nomination, will be a straw man candidate for Hillary to knock down. He does not have an icicle's chance in hell of becoming President.

There is only one candidate, who can unite the party behind true principles of conservatism and loyalty to the Constitution, and that is Ron Paul. People need to wake up and get used to the idea. I cringe at the massive hand wringing that will occur in retrospect after this country goes to "Hellary in a Hand Basket!!!"

I submit that it is time to face reality before it is too late. Get over your opposition to Ron Paul, already! He is the only candidate who has pledged to bring the troops home and who can attract the broad-based support needed to win. That is big political capital, as are all of the supporters (boots on the grassy ground) which are growing exponentially behind him every day...crowds of 1,500 in Thompson's state, 1,000 in Mitt's back yard in Utah, and 2,000+ in his home state of Michigan. Ron Paul will rejuvenate the party base.

Google Ron Paul!

Only one Republican candidate is pro-Liberty, pro-Constitution, and pro-limited-government, ALL the time, on every issue. You know who.

He also happens to be the only Republican candidate who can trump the Democrats on the war issue, which is the defining issue of this election. Keep in mind that 70% of all Americans want the troops home ASAP. This is the reason that we got trounced in the midterm election. True or not, the general perception is that the Democrats will get us out of the war more quickly than the Republicans.

If Republicans reject Dr. Ron Paul in the primaries, then we are absolutely doomed to defeat in the general election, just on the war issue alone. Say hello to socialized medicine, trade tariffs, big unions, high-unemployment, runaway inflation, you name it...

NOT ME!
I am an evangelical - and I refuse to put any endorsement that is contrary to my Bible believeing Christ loving beliefs.
I must say - SHAME ON YOU - to those that profess to be evangelicals, and support an anti-Christ religion. This is totally truthful what I am saying - its not an insult - just a fact.
I know who my candidate is - because he's true.

Writes:"I know who my candidate is - because he's true."

http://www.spectator.org/dsp_article.asp?art_id=12205

Fourteen times, the ethics commission -- a respected body, not a partisan witch-hunt group -- investigated claims against Huckabee. Five of those times, it officially reprimanded him. And, as only MSNBC among the big national media has reported at any real length, there were lots of other mini-scandals and embarrassments along the way.

He used public money for family restaurant meals, boat expenses, and other personal uses. He tried to claim as his own some $70,000 of furniture donated to the governor's mansion. He repeatedly, and obstinately, against the pleadings even from conservative columnists and editorials, refused to divulge the names of donors to a "charitable" organization he set up while lieutenant governor -- an outfit whose main charitable purpose seemed to be to pay Huckabee to make speeches. Then, as a kicker, he misreported the income itself from the suspicious "charity."

Huckabee has been criticized, reasonably so, for misusing the state airplane for personal reasons. And he and his wife, Janet, actually set up a "wedding gift registry" (they had already been married for years) to which people could donate as the Huckabees left the governorship, in order to furnish their new $525,000 home.