IS MOSCOW OBAMA'S FIRST MUNICH DISASTER?

Oh, you mean that war started by Mikheil Saakashvili with the tacit support of McCain advisor and noted neocon Randall Scheunemann?

Still fighting the "Red Menace", are we, Apollo? Always the Russophobes, you neocons.

Here's what an authentic conservative has to say about Russia. Read and weep, you imposters:

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2007/06/who_lost_ russia.html

Let us hope and pray Mr. Obama can undo at least SOME of the damage created by Messrs. Clinton and Bush.

You mean the war of aggression motivated by Russia's demographic crisis and neo-imperialist aims? Our adversaries are delighted with the weakling in the White House, and his naive belief expressed in his incoherent Cairo speech in the equality of nations-it is key to understanding the disaster that's unfolding before our eyes.

The Russians gave a lot of nukes to Chavez.

Check out Acorns new website, end22.com

would those be, ApolloSpeaks?

And do you really deny Saakashvili started that war?

How did you feel about the British actions to secure The Falklands, I wonder? And Russia has more of a stake in Abkahzia and South Ossetia than Great Britian has in The Falklands.

History will be the judge of Obama's diplomacy here, just as it is already serving as the judge of neocon misadventures in the Middle East. I'm thinking Obama may do better than you guys in this regard, and I say that as someone who neither voted for him nor who supports his domestic policies generally speaking. But right now, he seems to be doing some pretty effective damage control if you ask me.

http://www.amazon.com/Ronald-Reagan-Abolish-Nuclear-Weapons /dp/1400063078

Neo-con misadventures in the Middle East? What did Obama say in his Cairo Speech? "The people of Iraq are better off without Saddam." I have no regrets about altering 1000 years of Mid East politics and shaking up Sunni Islam's hegemony over the Arab world. Without "Big Bangs" and upheavals progress in that static region is impossible.

By the way, Cicero, Obama's foreign policy is an extension of his domestic policies. The two are inseparable and eqaually perilous.

While Iraq may be better off in certain respects with Hussein gone, Iran has as a result been made the regional Muslim power. Andf just days ago, they were celebrating our drawdown. Watch what happens if and when we withdraw entirely. Way to go neocons. Mission accomplished.

Over 4,000 American dead for nothing, countless more innocent Iraqis dead, and three trillion dollars down the rathole when it's all said and done. Yep, "misadventure" fits.

"By the way, Cicero, Obama's foreign policy is an extension of his domestic policies. The two are inseparable and eqaually perilous."

I'd like to see you demonstrate that.

And I note that you've thus far failed to answer my questions about The Falklands, who started the war in South Ossetia, and how Obama is to be blamed if Reagan is not to be blamed.

Could you just imagine Obama at Reykjavik finding the strength to walk out on Gorby! HA! After the walk out Gorby said: "I then realized that a new world was possible."

you answering my questions.

Iran is aspiring to regional hegemony, it's not there yet. America is the hegemon of the region. Will Obama abdicate our role and let Iran/Syria fill the vacuum? All catastophes are possible for this ignorant, clueless man.

Interesting put. I just see disarming as a laughable event to those that hate us.