Mel Martinez's auto-response to My question; Why allow the Treasury Dept. to circumvent the Constitution??

"Oh Really, then why did we boost the give-away with another $150,000,000,000 after the $700,000,000,000? How much more will they need in the Tomorrows?"

For your information, the $150 billion is actually part of the $700 billion.


GET YOUR FACTS STRAIGHT!

Oct. 16, 2008, Pat writes:

What is a Truth?
"Oh Really, then why did we boost the give-away with another $150,000,000,000 after the $700,000,000,000? How much more will they need in the Tomorrows?"
(lone rider)
---------------------------------------
For your information, the $150 billion is actually part of the $700 billion.
GET YOUR FACTS STRAIGHT!
(Pat)
---------------------------------------
Ouch! I'm surprised you avoided the major point of my concern, only to obscure the issue by arguing $ZEROs, Billion$ here, Trillion$ there!
But, How much more?

No matter from which side of the political perspective we are, we should at least be unanimously concerned that "Our Government", no matter who's at the helm, doesn't have the right to do an "End Run" around Our Constitution to Liberally Print Money!

Is that the truth you were seeking Pat?

(lone rider)
--------------------------------------
http://www.taxpayer.net/user_uploads/file/FederalBudget/sen atebailoutbill10-01-2008.pdf



Top 10 Tax Sweeteners in the Bailout Bill
Categories: Federal Budget, Headlines By TCS
Pub Date: Oct 09, 2008

http://www.taxpayer.net/resources.php?category=&type=Projec t&proj_id=1429&action=Headlines%20By%20TCS

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/michael-seitzman/make-them-fa mous-and-know_b_134207.html
--------------------------------------

This is the name of bills Democrats always use to make the plant pot Kool-aid drinkers think they are the party of compassion-wise an for the little guy all rolled into one.Can you say "fairnes Doctrine".Sounds so American,and with the rump swab media,we are helpless to do a lot.It doesn't help when Republicans catch the re-elect themselves for life,country be damned,and put 40% of the pork into this bill Pres.signed and promises the bills in the future will never ever have earmarks. He has already little by little redefined the word earmarks,so here we go back to the Clinton abridged American dictionary.There will be no hypocracy in this administration,because they will continue to use the liquid dictionary.Obama said flat out,there is no earmarks in this bill.Since this crisis is bound to get worse due to punitive business taxes and rules,the "emergency" bills will always be on the back burner,waiting for their turn to eat another basic economic cornerstone for lunch.Until we get some real leadership at the RNC,this will continue.