Amendment 22: Suspension At Our Peril

"...The Clintons, that is expert at acting on suspect interpretations of our laws before all the rest of us have had a chance to determine whether their actions are Constitution"


Law is not to be interpreted, it is to be understood. It is not written in Koynea Greek, or Sanskrit. Social engineers use a language, a specific language that is coded to entice those who agree with them and it s rhetorical puzzlefor those of trying to understand them. This language is geared specifically to confuse and derail. Intepretation is a facismilie of understanding - it seeks not to know but to engage specifically what it agrees with and discards the remainder as unusefull to "the cause". I challenge you disearn their rhetoric against what you know commonly to be the understanding of any aspect of the constitution, or science vs. scientism when they bring their arguments to bear.. in the end they'll have nothing but sophic hyperbole and and repeat it it'll you believe hi-jinks but no fact to support their rants. Interesting post... keep it up!



-That Darn Republican

Thanks for the response.

Crucial to my original blog is this sentence:

> We have a dyadic organization, The Clintons, that is expert at acting on suspect interpretations of our laws before all the rest of us have had a chance to determine whether their actions are Constitutional.<

Understand what is meant by "Dyad." Now, let's move to the basic contention: The Clinton Dyad
operates, has operated, and will operate to interpret Constitutional, criminal, and civil laws for their own political ends. '"It all depends on what your definition of the word, 'IS,' is."' exemplifies, in thought and practice, how the Clinton Dyad operates. The only other operation I have seen with my own eyes interpret logic and law in this way is the Mafia/Cosa Nostra, although, it is becoming evermore the case as the years pass that the Radical Liberal bureaucracies institutionalize such sophistical practices for their own ends.

Only two candidates in this election cycle seem to have studied the Constitution with a will to live out in word and practice its original intent: Ron Paul and Mitt Romney. Mr. Romney has a law degree from Harvard. Ron Paul has schooled himself. The Clinton Dyad attended the Yale Law School and while there affiliated with Communist law firms in Oakland, California, which are adroit in interpreting the Constitution in order to achieve anti-Constitutional political ends, just as we now see in the current Clinton Dyad campaign per se.