Join the Debate
41 Comments So Far
« Previous1Next »
bachcole Wrote: Sep 27, 2010 10:39 PM
And further furthermore, the FDA is evil, it is a tyrannous. FDA officials are the scum of the earth. They are morally depraved tyrants.
wdwrkr Wrote: Sep 27, 2010 10:57 PM
They're ALL evil tyrants:
DOEnergy
DOEducation
DOAg
IRS
EPA

I wonder what George Washington, Ben Franklin, John Adams, and the rest of the patriots that rebelled against England, would think of us. They risked their LIVES to secure freedom and liberty. Yet we put up with this tyrannical gov't. And I don't mean just the current administration. The Repubs were not much better when they were the majority.
bachcole Wrote: Sep 27, 2010 10:36 PM
And furthermore, we already have proof that spend and tax does not work: The Great FDR/Hoover Depression.
bachcole Wrote: Sep 27, 2010 10:34 PM
I am surprised that Ann did not rip that Dem moron. The New Republican Party, spelled T.E.A., is not the Bush-McCain Republican Party. We actually want to encourage business by not meddling and by taxing much less. What a freaking concept!!
wdwrkr Wrote: Sep 27, 2010 10:21 PM
The Dem "strategist" is correct that the Repubs are bad.

And yet, Obama and his administration, full of clowns and incompetents, has managed to make the Repubs look good!
FromTheTop1 Wrote: Sep 27, 2010 7:29 PM
HAPPY 2008!
Far from addressing entitlements and getting the government out of the health-care business, the pledge would leave the welfare state largely intact, content — once you flip past the preamble — to “rein in” but not stop the government’s growth. How? By vowing to roll out-of-control federal spending all the way back to . . . the out-of-control levels of 2008.

PLAYING SCARED
They’re still petrified. The pledge is living proof. It is manifest in the GOP’s fear of grappling with the viability of the welfare state…
But count me more frustrated than inspired by the Republicans’ Pledge to America.

http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/247785/empty-promise-andrew-c-mccarthy

Erwin44 Wrote: Sep 27, 2010 7:02 PM
Look, Nader may be crazy, and many of his ideas may stink ... but he did say that the Democratic and Republican parties merged to become one party, the "business party" and he was right about that. And we are the ones getting the 'business'.
Basset Hound in TX Wrote: Sep 27, 2010 5:27 PM
"FAILED economic policy?????"

EXCUSE ME??????

If 4.5% unemployment is FAILURE then what the hell is 9+% unemployment (which we are told to accept as the 'new normal')?????

Is a RECORD high number people on food stamps what they define as SUCCESS???

Beam me up Scotty. There's no more intelligent life on this planet.
Audrey34 Wrote: Sep 27, 2010 3:32 PM
Our Federal Government is a very exclusive and very private club to which we all pay annual dues, but we are prohibited from actually joining, unless we meet the following membership qualifications:
1. Become active political party supporters for many years, or
2. Become active members of a lobbyist group
3. Live in the Wasington, D.C. area with a second/vacation home in an 'approved' area (Northeast)
4. Have degrees in law, journalism, social science, or public administration from the 'right' schools
5. Have a large savings/investment account or trust fund so that we do not have to actually go to work anywhere

If anyone doesn't meet all of the above criteria they are simply not acceptable (but don't forget to pay your membership...
MesaMo Wrote: Sep 27, 2010 1:53 PM
Why do the Democrats always and forever get to claim that the Repuplicans get to put "corrupt Wall Street" back in power? Democrats and Obama got all Wall Streets' money. Democrats are mainly the one who disfavor free markets in favor of crony capitalism. The myth of the Republican-Wall Street connection needs to be challenged.
Tommy R. Wrote: Sep 27, 2010 1:25 PM
The thing about this tape is the silly democrat woman saying as to whether her party's candidates should highlight Obama, "Oh, I think he's a huge asset!!!" Oh, honey, yes you Demmies just run and run and run on your beloved Fearless Leader! Make every connection you can to him - let America know that every vote for a liberal is a vote for Hussein! YOU GO GIRL!
Bear Trax Wrote: Sep 27, 2010 10:51 AM
The problem with the message is that for democrats, the source of all wealth is the government, and the source of that is the printing press. That's called the "easy way out". Print-up trillions of dollars, pay-off all youir union thugs, and the bill comes due after you're out of office.

The problem for republicans is they got caught up in the same, "No educrat left behind" "Prescription drug benefit" and 2 wars all on the borrowed dime. At the time, the strategy was to "spend up all the money, then if the democrats got back into control, they couldn't pay-off their supporters". You see how that turned out. Trillions upon trillions to the fat cats on wall street, the bankers, and insurancew companies, nothing for the goods...
CeeTee Wrote: Sep 27, 2010 11:05 AM
boehner is already saying that he will back earmarks in the next congress.

New bottle, old wine.
Jo312 Wrote: Sep 27, 2010 12:12 PM
Meet the new GOP, same as the old GOP - tell voters what they want to hear. If they keep it up the GOP will be the new THIRD party, and TEA will become the second.
Tom2309 Wrote: Sep 27, 2010 10:24 AM
When I see broadcasts like this one, one thing they seem to have in common is somebody identified solely as a "Deomcrat Strategist' whose face and incoe-earning occupation always goes unspecified. When I view Fox and the opposing persons are identified, invariably, the conservative/GOP spokesperson is identified as a magazine (iidentified by name) editor, or newpaper writer (whose newspaper employer is identified) followed by yet another murky person who seems to be soley one of these Den "strategists" Just WHO reliaes on these faceless people is never said.. When I hear these "strategists" spouting the same daily DNC talking points over ad over it seems more suitably for them to be identified to the public as "Dem apologists" or Dem...
Greg1084 Wrote: Sep 27, 2010 6:41 AM
The C& ck Sacker gives the dem nearly a half-minute to finish up the conversation.
Anonymous18198 Wrote: Sep 27, 2010 12:26 AM
The Duh party just doesn't get it. They are driving the country to oblivion and the LIKE it!
JapesMacFarLand Wrote: Sep 26, 2010 10:43 PM
The Dems and Liberal's credibility needs to be continually eroded. It is because they just lie like this, that average people in politics need to more and more question if the D's are telling the truth. They've gotten away with lying for so long in such saturation that too many people just accept it and say, "Oh that sounds right" and to such nonsense as this Democratic strategist was saying.
One way in continuing to help their eroding credibility is to stop calling them liberals and start calling them leftists. (The D party has been taken over by leftists, there are no more real liberals.)
The word leftist or even Statist is easier or better in distinguishing the differences between conservatives and them. The word liberal has too...
Sonny141 Wrote: Sep 26, 2010 3:22 AM
Please, how much more wrong, could this Liberal Democratic strategist be.. Unbelievable..!!! Everything she said was an outright Lie, and blatant political rhetorical spin..!!! What else id new.. that's what Liberal are all about, Lies and BS con jobs..
Jim Weber Wrote: Sep 27, 2010 8:36 AM
All they have is talking points. Nothing more.
Jim Weber Wrote: Sep 27, 2010 8:37 AM
All they have is talking points. Nothing more.
dean50 Wrote: Sep 25, 2010 3:29 PM
The problem with this video is that Ann Coulter only made a couple of good points.

The Democrat, on the other hand, repeated the same old talking points that seem to have sold the idiots in our country.

The "same old ways" of pre-2004---ARE good ways!!!

Cutting taxes and creating jobs-----GOOD.

However, I think that Republicans keep getting sucked into the muck-------They NEED to explain in easy-to-understand language to all the morons that, IT IS THE PRIVATE SECTOR THAT HAS GENERATED AND SUPPLIED ALL THOSE JOBS FOR THE LAST 200 YEARS!!!!!!-----MORONS.

The government that can only give you a little here and a little there---is really your enemy!!

Thomas Jefferson said that.."Government big enough to supply everything you need, is...
Enderdog Wrote: Sep 25, 2010 2:17 PM
Here's a better edited version of my comments.

http://singingpig.blogtownhall.com/
Enderdog Wrote: Sep 25, 2010 9:51 AM
Typical John Boehner. Another wannabe "leader" with impressive credentials like joining with the Gang of Fourteen to roll over on judicial confirmations....who was his buddy in that? Oh yeah! John McCain!

It chaps my a$$ when I listen to all the "Johns coming lately" seemingly embrace the righteous indignation of the only real grassroots movement this country has seen since the sixties. They bring their watery gruel of vague promises...er...excuse me...Pledge!, to kind of, sort of, work toward maybe going back to the very place we were when they fell out of the power tree.

This lame attempt to seem to agree with the people they are obviously still trying to farm, without actually promising anything concrete, shows me that the GOP...
Enderdog Wrote: Sep 25, 2010 10:28 AM
How about a firm promise to elect one of the incoming Freshmen Citizen Legislators as the next Speaker of the House? Now that would be a healthy sign that he was committing to rehabilitate the GOP, and aligning it with the actual people he's sworn to serve, instead of merely trying to co-opt the wave for his own purposes. He's no more a believable surfer than...what was that guy's name?..Oh yeah....Kerry!...yet another of the many John's trolling K Street, like it was the Vegas Strip.

It reminds me of nothing so much, as the out-of-town cousin at a big family picnic. Fresh from the Ivy League, he is no more interested in mingling and talking to his relatives than he would be helping them muck out the horse barn. He's just there to...
Enderdog Wrote: Sep 25, 2010 11:09 AM
...sorry...Meant to type "that label".

The Tea Party is not a party in the sense that the word is used for political Parties. Although the MSM would like you to conflate them in your mind. It makes it much easier to fool people if they succeed in that. But, there are no Tea Party members. There are Tea Partiers...those who attend events, where actual processes happen. Have you ever been to a Republican Party? Or a Democrat Party? Of course not. You may have been to a Republican Party event. Or a Democrat Party event. Have you been to a Tea party? Maybe. See the difference? When is the next Tea party? Does it make any sense to ask" When is the next Republican Party?"

Tea Partiers understand that they are people, who are acting. They...
Enderdog Wrote: Sep 25, 2010 11:11 AM
And they know it. Don't vote for the vote for the noun Partys. Vote is a verb. An action.

Party like it's 1776.
dreadnaught2 Wrote: Sep 25, 2010 2:13 PM

PLEASE, Enderdog;

You and I each have one vote. You could never vote every single one in or out. You just know how to bloviate.

There's just one way to effect an important change; and it's to join the major party most likely to win the national election-- either the leftist Democrats or our other alternative-- the GOP. your displeasure with Republicans now in office is really irrelevant, since you can only vote in your state of residence. Just as I do. We can all vote together to place a Republican in the White House, and hope to replace incumbents in our home state. It was always that way. Note that I've stated all these things using up a fourth of space you did, bloviating out of your mind.
Enderdog Wrote: Sep 26, 2010 10:48 AM
Thank you for your reply, dreadnaught. Before we can vote to place either a Republican or a Democrat in the White House, we have to capture the attention of the "Parties" enough to convince them to put us someone worth voting for. The only way to do that is to send a message....as the Tea Partiers are doing.

You thought I was bloviating?!!! Dang, I was going more for a John Stewart or Dennis Miller thing, than an O'Reilly thing. You hurt my feeling, dude!
olddambob Wrote: Sep 26, 2010 7:15 PM
How about this idea, "Never, ever, re-elect anybody. Period!
carol1983 Wrote: Sep 25, 2010 8:14 AM
the "change that everyone voted for". What changes did obama promise? If you ask people, you will hear about 50 different changes! I've heard him descirbed as a man who proposes to 5 different women and sets a date and church. Now they've all shown up in white and he can't keep his promises to all 5.
Tim1512 Wrote: Sep 25, 2010 7:39 AM
Well, we've seen what the Democrats have to offer: 10% unemployment, trillion dollar deficits as far as the eye can see, a Congress that dictates rather than serves, a shrinking private sector and an exploding public sector. No thanks. Change it BACK.
Lynne99 Wrote: Sep 24, 2010 8:56 PM
Yeah right! My teenager cannot find a job because of all this "hopey-changey" crap that we are enduring!
carol1983 Wrote: Sep 25, 2010 8:19 AM
My college graduate daughter went back to her summer job at a clothing store. They were happy to give her about 35 hours per week. The store is staffed by college students, college graduates and non-college hispanic males. These are the two groups taking the jobs from your teenage daughter. College grads can't even find entry level positions so they are going back to their part-time summer jobs for full time employment.
Dan_NV Wrote: Sep 24, 2010 7:36 PM
Hmmm! Failed policies indeed! So contrast America on the end of the Bush presidency with the first two years of the Obama administration. Are you better off than you were two years ago?
ROB--RAGE Wrote: Sep 24, 2010 4:07 PM
Excellent commentary Ms. Coulter......The Democrat Party and Obama's Lapdog Media Hardcore Base is Shrinking Daily...Pretty soon it'll be down to Fidel Castro, Michael Moore and Sean Penn..!
DocForesight Wrote: Sep 24, 2010 11:45 AM
I love the smell of Class Warfare in the morning! Maria, dear, Wall Street is doing just fine under Dem "rules", that's why Wall Street Bigs have donated so much to the Dem party. Follow the money, honey.

And those terrible 8 years under GWB where we had 5% unemployment, millions of new jobs even following 9/11 and, remember this -- GWB and McCain tried to warn Congress about the Fannie & Freddie problem but were ignored by Dodd and Frank.
Jeff P Wrote: Sep 24, 2010 5:38 PM
Yeah, amazing how that part of the story is so cleverly forgotten by the left. I pray to God these people some day soon will start living in reality.
carol1983 Wrote: Sep 25, 2010 8:24 AM
Your comment: Wall Street is doing just fine under Dem "rules"
I wonder if Wall street is affraid of the Tea Party Republicans. They've prospered under the Rinos and Dems and both have proven they are for sale to special interests.
« Previous1Next »