Discrimination Based On Pigmentation, Not History
Aug 06, 2008 03:04 PM EST
The New York Times recently reported on Barack Obama’s long-standing support for affirmative action that gives preferential treatment to members of disadvantaged minorities. While still a student at Harvard Law School , Obama readily admitted that “I undoubtedly benefited from affirmative action,” but the deeper question is how he could justify that advantage. Apologists for preferences explain these policies as a remedy for long family histories of discrimination, but Obama’s background features no such legacy of oppression.
His mother was white and his father’s family, in Kenya , had never been enslaved or subjected to American “Jim Crow” laws or segregation. Both parents earned graduate degrees, so his only basis for preferential treatment would have been skin color, not family disadvantage. That’s typical of affirmative action, which treats people differently based on pigmentation alone, not their origins or experiences.
Michael Medved
Michael Medved's daily syndicated radio talk show reaches one of the largest national audiences every weekday between 3 and 6 PM, Eastern Time. Michael Medved is the author of eleven books, including the bestsellers
What Really Happened to the Class of '65?, Hollywood vs. America, Right Turns,
The Ten Big Lies About America and
5 Big Lies About American Business
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read Michael Medved's column.
Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.