What Happened, Mr. President? | Bill O'Reilly
20 Reasons To Dislike The Democrat Party | John Hawkins
Outside Money Could Change Massachusetts Senate Race | Heather Ginsberg
Obama's Emptiest Benghazi Talking Point | Michelle Malkin
Acting IRS Commissioner Doesn't Know Who's Responsible, Objects to "Targeting" as "Pejorative" Term | Guy Benson
Boom: Obama Administration Knew of IRS Targeting in June of 2012 | Guy Benson
CBS News: Benghazi Counterterrorism Response Team "Ruled Out From The Start" | Guy Benson
Surprise: Obama Poised to Promote Susan Rice | Guy Benson
Recommend this article
As I'm sure you probably heard, Alaska Senator Ted Stevens' house was raided by the FBI and IRS. Now, I have no knowledge of whether he's innocent or guilty of any crime, but what I do know is that he is guilty of being a squish. As such, I join with RedState's Erick in encouraging a primary challenger to oppose Stevens.
So why are conservatives so quick to throw a Republican Senator -- even a liberal one -- under the bus? There are a few reasons for this:
It's also important to note that our tolerance for squishy Republicans was probably higher when we were holding on to the majority by a string. Back then, if keeping a Ted Stevens in the Senate meant our Supreme Justice nominees would face a Republican Senate, rather than a Democrat Senate, many conservatives were probably willing to look the other way. But we don not currently hold the majority -- and the prospects for re-gaining the majority don't look so good, either. Now is the time ...
In addition, I see this time in history as sort of a rebuilding period for the GOP (at the Congressional level). When a sports team is rebuilding, they usually decide to bring in some fresh talent to develop for the future -- and that's just what the GOP needs. It's hard for any team to accept that they have to take a step back before they can take a giant leap forward. But from a branding perspective, how can we become the face of change when people associate us with a man who has been in the Senate since 1968 - and whose claim to fame is how much federal spending he can command?
As you can see, it's a very dangerous time to be a squishy Republican. The conservatives don't like you -- and the Democrats want your seat. It will be interesting to see if this leads to some retirements ...
So why are conservatives so quick to throw a Republican Senator -- even a liberal one -- under the bus? There are a few reasons for this:
It's also important to note that our tolerance for squishy Republicans was probably higher when we were holding on to the majority by a string. Back then, if keeping a Ted Stevens in the Senate meant our Supreme Justice nominees would face a Republican Senate, rather than a Democrat Senate, many conservatives were probably willing to look the other way. But we don not currently hold the majority -- and the prospects for re-gaining the majority don't look so good, either. Now is the time ...
In addition, I see this time in history as sort of a rebuilding period for the GOP (at the Congressional level). When a sports team is rebuilding, they usually decide to bring in some fresh talent to develop for the future -- and that's just what the GOP needs. It's hard for any team to accept that they have to take a step back before they can take a giant leap forward. But from a branding perspective, how can we become the face of change when people associate us with a man who has been in the Senate since 1968 - and whose claim to fame is how much federal spending he can command?
As you can see, it's a very dangerous time to be a squishy Republican. The conservatives don't like you -- and the Democrats want your seat. It will be interesting to see if this leads to some retirements ...
Recommend this article
- Topics:
- Congress
- Government Spending
Matt Lewis
Follow @twitterapi
Matt Lewis is conservative writer and blogger based in Alexandria, VA.
Be the first to read Matt Lewis' column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com delivered each morning to your inbox.
