And This Is Why No One Watches the WNBA Part 675
Dems Are Going to Get Shucked Hard in Maine
Republicans Might Deserve to Lose If They Don’t Do Something About Rogue Judges
The Pelley Drama Continues and the Audience Is Beginning to Wane, As CBS...
Does Anybody Have the Answers?
Lessons From Graham Platner
Trump's Critics Dead Wrong (Again) on the Economy
Donald J. Trumpberger
You Can’t Fake Real
When Students Rise, Tyrants Tremble
The Housing Market Needs President Trump’s Solutions
Things I Know and Don't Know About a Deal With the Islamic Republic
America’s Love Affair With the Drive-in Theater
Bernie’s Stupid Scheme to Socialize AI Must Be Stopped
The Karmelo Anthony Case Has Countless People Denying Reality
Tipsheet

Progress on Earmarks

Progress on Earmarks
There is no doubt that headway has been made in the battle to reform earmarks, at least among House Republicans that is.

Last week, during debate on the Commerce, Justice, and Science (CJS) appropriations bill, 10 amendments were debated on the floor by myself, Rep. Jeff Flake (R-AZ), and Rep. Jeb Hensarling (R-TX). These amendments would strike various earmarks present in the bill.
Advertisement


This alone is altogether not particularly newsworthy, but on average, just under 65% of the Republican conference voted in favor of striking the earmarks in all 10 amendments. I remember in 2006, when it was almost taboo to vote ‘yes’ on measures like these, and there were only a handful of us fighting to reform the process, limit the wasteful spending, and staunch the tide of earmark corruption. Clearly, the message has gotten through to my colleagues.

Of course, there is still much work to be done on this front, but with the majority of the Republican caucus backing reform, perhaps now is the time to address sweeping and substantive earmark reform.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement