In service of the argument that the invasion of Iraq made Islamist jihadism worse, the unbalanced-by-Bush-Derangement-Syndrome staff of the New York Times prints accounts of another classified document, thus claiming the hat-trick of leaks of national security secrets in time of war.  The Times argues that unnamed "intelligence analysts" from the agencies blasted by Lawrence Wright, Bill Gertz and others for incompetence before and after 9/11 --agencies from within which numerous attempts to undermine the Bush Adminsitration have issued periodically over the past few years-- are certain that the invasion of Iraq made the problem of terrorism worse, not better. 

Powerline's Paul Mirengoff responds responds.

From Wikipedia:

 

2002

 

2003

One of the compounds hit by the Riyadh Compound Bombings.
Enlarge
One of the compounds hit by the Riyadh Compound Bombings.

I wonder what the NIE says about this timeline, or about the arming of Hezbollah with the rockets and missiles that fell on Israel throughout the summer?  I guess we are to believe that had the United States simply not invaded Iraq, the world would be at peace, the Kashmir, Thailand, Indonesia, the Phillipines and of course Lebanon and the West Bank and Gaza would be far along in their transition to Democracy.

And Iraq as well.  The prisons would have been emptied, Saddam well along on his path to reform, with his sons pursuing new careers and Zarqawi imprisoned,  Oil-for-Food-for-Terrorist subsidies audited and abuses uncovered, and no London bombings or plots.

There is no doubt the New York Times believes this, and the same is true of the Democratic Party leadership.

Which is why every vote for every Congressional Democrat is a vote against victory and a vote for vulnerability.