Tip Sheet

Krauthammer: Mr. Hopenchange Is Offering Al Qaeda 9-11, Act II

Greg Hengler
Blogger, Townhall.com

Tweet

Click Here!

Tags: Foreign Affairs , National Security , Gaffe

Breaking on TOWNHALL

Join the Debate

34 Comments So Far

Login in to Post Your Comments

joe kidd Wrote: Nov 19, 2009 8:14 AM

the left does not care if the terrorists are convicted or not . their enemy is GW Bush . I expect the terrorists to be acquited in New York . Most of the evidence against them will be considered tainted and will be thrown out . Holder will then indite Bush ,Cheney and others in the administration and use the terrorists testimony to convict them of war crimes or someother nonsense . they are using this trial as a political ploy to destroy their political enemies the people their ideaology regards as the real enemy .

Flag as Offensive

Post Comment

deltagreen Wrote: Nov 19, 2009 7:58 AM

My bet is that KSM's red diaper self hating jewish ACLU lawyers go for someplace like Dearbornistan MI or Fremontistan CA. Then he can be tried by his true peers under Sharia Law and found not guilty.

Flag as Offensive

Post Comment

dreadnaught2 Wrote: Nov 18, 2009 3:06 PM

You are full of it.

"[Blahblah]local newspapers or internet rants do not corresond to a national commentator like Krauthammer saying on a national television program that the president is providing the terrorists with a second 9/11. Once again, no national liberal spokesman ever said anything as vile."

Krauthammer has an obligation to tell the truth and nothing but the truth.

It's a fact; with the NYC trials, al Qaeda and Islamofascists can publicly bring back the spirit of 9-11 and glory in their wholesale murder. That's EXACTLY what they wish for; to broadcast it all over the world.

Holder wants them to have this second act --jihad power on a stage-- right where the two ...

Flag as Offensive

Post Comment

peacefrog Wrote: Nov 18, 2009 2:30 PM

Should I give a few, Bush knowingly let people die in N.O. because he's a racist comments?

Nothing vile there right vladdy

Flag as Offensive

Post Comment

peacefrog Wrote: Nov 18, 2009 2:25 PM

I'll do ya one better

Here's Olbermann BLAMING Bush for 9/11

truthseeker2473.blogspot.com/2008/09/

Funny how you went from no one said VILE things about Bush to show me where Olbermann said Bush was enabling another 9/11 after your stupid VILE claim was debunked

Good job

Flag as Offensive

Post Comment

NOTW Wrote: Nov 18, 2009 1:58 PM

I did answer the question with a question which implies your answer was a conviction.

Again, at what cost to our agencies that protect us?

Good luck trying to find an impartial jury in NYC. A friend lost his brother that worked at Cantor. Hundred of people showed up for his funeral. He also lost 27 friends from the Forest Hills neighborhood, all policemen and firemen. Now multiply that out with the thousands of people that died that day that knew hundreds of people...This isnt a failed Bombing of 1993, its a scar that NYers will want vengance for.

Hundred bucks says a change of venue will be sought by the defense. How about LA? You wouldnt be 'afraid' as much as you'd be ticked at the nightmare it would bring to...

Flag as Offensive

Post Comment

vladimir estragon Wrote: Nov 18, 2009 1:34 PM

Yes, indeed, show me where Olbermann says that Bush was enabling a second 9/11.

Flag as Offensive

Post Comment

SJA Wrote: Nov 18, 2009 1:31 PM

Was just reading the diatribe from Matthews following Bush's farewell speech.

Too bad Vladie does not do a little research before he posts. I guess he considers the daily talking points from Huffington facts.

Flag as Offensive

Post Comment

peacefrog Wrote: Nov 18, 2009 1:25 PM

Should I post some of Olbermanns comments about Bush or would you like to?

Flag as Offensive

Post Comment

peacefrog Wrote: Nov 18, 2009 1:20 PM

I'll tell ya what happened

They were convicted

But not before ultra liberal attorney Lynne Stewart fell in love with the blind sheik and gladly passed along notes between him and his cronnies leading to more death and destruction around the world.

Flag as Offensive

Post Comment

eddie too Wrote: Nov 18, 2009 1:17 PM

provides them with another opportunity for worldwide sensationalism, just as 9-11 provided them with world wide sensationalism.

it should also weaken america, strengthen al qaeda, and advance the jihadists' objectives.

BO and holder know what they are doing.

why do you think BO is spending millions of dollars to keep the american people from knowing his past?

Flag as Offensive

Post Comment

SJA Wrote: Nov 18, 2009 1:17 PM

No one can make Lonny the Lunatic face the difference in these two cases. He also refuses to accept the harm done to the New York and New Jersey families who lost their loved ones. On 9/11 while Lonny was busy worrying about the real problems in the US like who his gay son would hook up with others faced the Horror of losing their loved ones. Many spend days searching hospitals in the hopes that by some miracle their loved one had survived. Many will never be the same after witnessing people throw themselves from the windows of the towers rather than burn to death.

The so called compassionate libs like Looney are busy worrying about the really important things like how they can shove gay marriage down our throats or how we...

Flag as Offensive

Post Comment

eddie too Wrote: Nov 18, 2009 1:13 PM

columnist say that the dems plan to force universal registration on all 50 states.

this means that the dems have unlimited imaginary voters to elect their candidates.

BO and the dems definitely do not plan to lose the Congress in 2010.

think back to the black panther, club wielding thugs that stood outside the phildelphia polling booth with impunity after BO's AG droppped charges against them.

trial balloon anyone?

Flag as Offensive

Post Comment

eddie too Wrote: Nov 18, 2009 1:11 PM

trial in a civilian court makes perfect sense, if your intentions are to weaken america.

it also makes perfect sense, if your intentions are to create jihadist heroes and martyrs.

if also makes perfect sense, if your intentions are minimize their actions.

despite what you may think, there is always a reason for BO's actions, his changing of positions, his lies, his obfuscations, his america demeaning rhetoric, his ridiculous political positions.

either BO knows what he is doing or he is a moron and morons, even mulatto morons do not graduate from Columbia and Harvard law.

Flag as Offensive

Post Comment

vladimir estragon Wrote: Nov 18, 2009 1:08 PM

Citations of obscenities in local newspapers or internet rants do not corresond to a national commentator like Krauthammer saying on a national television program that the president is providing the terrorists with a second 9/11. Once again, no national liberal spokesman ever said anything as vile as what Krauthammer says here.

Flag as Offensive

Post Comment

eddie too Wrote: Nov 18, 2009 1:05 PM

with leftists is a fine example of futility.

good luck to those who engage they leftists like gene the ax, septic schizo, loony lon, and poor pathetic vlad.

realize, these guys/gals think their posts make sense.

realizing that would tell you how fruitful engaging them on TH is going to be.

just pointout their inanities to the rest of us. goading them only produces more ridiculous and absurd posts.

of course, i know teasing the kittens can be amusing.

Flag as Offensive

Post Comment

clarityseeker2 Wrote: Nov 18, 2009 1:01 PM

with the demented and delusional rants of Vlad-The-Impaler.

Despite theri delusions, they are indeed entitled to their own opinions.

I knew Sickero had marginalized himself in anything he professed when he came out in support of the, "Birther" blather.

He did have me fooled before this, I will admit to that. I was quite surprised to discover that he actually sailed on that ship.

Flag as Offensive

Post Comment

Lonny4 Wrote: Nov 18, 2009 12:58 PM

you refuse to answer the question. Did they try the first WTC bombers in a criminal court in NYC? What happened?

Why are you 'conservatives' so darn afraid of our bill of rights?

Flag as Offensive

Post Comment

clarityseeker2 Wrote: Nov 18, 2009 12:56 PM

"Which brings us to ``Death of a President," a new movie about the assassination of George W. Bush.

Written and directed by British filmmaker Gabriel Range, the movie premieres today at the Toronto Film Festival and will air next month on Britain's Channel 4. Shot in the style of a documentary, the movie opens with what looks like actual footage of Bush being gunned down by a sniper as he leaves a Chicago hotel in October 2007. Through the use of digital special effects, the film superimposes the president's face onto the body of the actor playing him, so that the mortally wounded man collapsing on the screen will seem, all too vividly, to be Bush himself.

This is Bush-hatred as a snuff film. The fantasies it feeds are...

Flag as Offensive

Post Comment

colt.45 Wrote: Nov 18, 2009 12:56 PM

again and again and again.This policy of bringing these muslim thugs to New York will backfire.These trials won't be about Bush.They'll be about Islam and Allah loses.Islam is not about peace.

I'm tired of being told that Islam is a "Religion of Peace," when every day I can read dozens of stories of Muslim men killing their sisters, wives and daughters for their family "honor"; of Muslims rioting over some slight offense; of Muslims murdering Christian and Jews because they aren't "believers"; of Muslims burning schools for girls; of Muslims stoning teenage rape victims to death for "adultery"; of Muslims mutilating the genitals of little girls; all in the name of Allah, because the Qur'an and Shari'a law tells them...

Flag as Offensive

Post Comment

NOTW Wrote: Nov 18, 2009 12:56 PM

"Be afraid, be very afraid. How come we were able to try the first WTC bomber in a criminal proceeding, and win? "

At what cost? Oh yes, for the Libs it will be a double win if in the process they can undermine the FBI and CIA in the process. Your lawyer buddies will have a field day with disclosure and all the funny little games you play to skirt the truth.

A jury of peers for a terrorist? Does that mean they'll be asking the jury pool, Are you a terrorist by training or profession?

Flag as Offensive

Post Comment

clarityseeker2 Wrote: Nov 18, 2009 12:52 PM

probably having contributed to this is that abuse he has delivered to his brain with all of those, mind-altering "distractions"...

Flag as Offensive

Post Comment

clarityseeker2 Wrote: Nov 18, 2009 12:50 PM

G.W. Bush.

This was cemented with the fullscale, Hollywierd production of a feature movie SPECIFICALLY based on the assasination of president G. W. Bush.

BUT---Vlad-The-Impaler does not consider that vile, nor does Vlad count that as "attacking" Bush.

By Jeff Jacoby, Globe Columnist | September 10, 2006

SIX YEARS into the Bush administration, are there any new lows to which the Bush-haters can sink?

George W. Bush has been smeared by the left with every insult imaginable. He has been called a segregationist who yearns to revive Jim Crow and compared ad nauseam to Adolf Hitler. His detractors have accused him of being financially entwined with Osama bin Laden. Of presiding over an American gulag. Of...

Flag as Offensive

Post Comment

NOTW Wrote: Nov 18, 2009 12:47 PM

How does the old saying go?

Hope is a good breakfast, but a bad supper.

Flag as Offensive

Post Comment

SJA Wrote: Nov 18, 2009 12:47 PM

You are wasting your time presenting facts to Vladdie. You know he will not understand them. Huffington gave him his marching orders for the day. That means he cannot open his mind to reality he will get too confused.

Flag as Offensive

Post Comment

New comments on this article - click to refresh