In my earlier post this morning, I somehow failed to mention the most important inconsistency of all in the position of conservatives who support a judicial redefinition of marriage: How, exactly, do they intend to protect the conscience rights of those who -- for religious reasons -- do not believe in a new definition of marriage? Or do their First Amendment rights simply dissolve by judicial fiat? After all, if gay marriage becomes a constitutionally protected right, how can the conscience rights of true religious objectors be accommodated?
Eric Erickson lays out the argument elegantly here http://www.redstate.com/2013/03/26/gay-marriage-and-religious-freedom-are-not-compatible/.
BREAKING: New Undercover Video Reveals Planned Parenthood Willing to Sell Organs From Delivered Babies | Katie Pavlich
Fmr. Planned Parenthood Director: Biz Is Making $100 to $200 Off Each Fetal Body Part | Brooke Carlucci