In America, the victory of environmental regulation seems to be a foregone conclusion for many of the nation's largest companies. Companies like ExxonMobil and Wal-Mart, which have typically had very strong ties to Republicans, are among those incorporating an internal form of a carbon tax into their long-term financial plans.
It isn't often that you get reading suggestions from a United States senator, but that's what happened this past weekend for those who attended the National Review Institute's summit meeting in Washington, D.C.
With our Presidential candidates clear, there's no better issue to contrast our choice than energy policy. At MittRomney.com, Romney provides an energy plan for the future that balances economic growth and jobs, diversified energy development, and realistic environmental safeguards. His approach stresses a rational and streamlined approach to regulation, approval of the Keystone Pipeline, and opening America's vast energy resources for development.
President Obama and Senate Democrats need to take Lemonade Economics 101.
When the president's weekend radio address brought up the Buffett Rule again, I felt a twinge in my stomach. Oh, for goodness sake! You can't be serious about this plan as an economic cure-all when it was debunked by a bipartisan committee just a few days ago.
President Obama was speaking in the White House Rose Garden this past Thursday. Our nation’s energy problems –problems that, as he stated last month, have plagued our country for over thirty years – could now be addressed with one simple juxtaposition and one obvious choice for those who serve in the House and Senate.
Surprise: Taxpayer Funded PBS Fails to Ask Hillary a Single Question About FBI Investigation | Matt Vespa
Congress Passes North Korea Sanctions, Ryan Says "Strategic Patience" is Not Working | Cortney O'Brien
Thanks, Obama: North Carolina's Largest Health Insurance Provider Could Leave ACA Market | Matt Vespa