In response to:

Sandra Fluke: Opposing the Contraception Mandate Is Just Like Opposing Leukemia Coverage

ZealousConscript Wrote: Feb 02, 2013 6:08 AM
So a point is made about a religious organization, of somewhere in the neighborhood of 1.3 million people in the United States, does indeed object to blood transfusions as a medical practice. So its completely possible that a large employer owned by a Jehovah's Witness, would not allow blood transfusions under their healthcare. Should we stand for this?

On MSNBC this afternoon, Sandra Fluke truly outdid herself, attempting to argue that the people who disagree with the contraception mandate on religious freedom grounds are in the same category as people who oppose insurance coverage for leukemia.

What's important to note is that some of the folks who are continuing to object to this policy are actually worried about employers who are private companies, not religiously affiliated employers in any way, but the boss has a particular religious concern, and they want to be able to deny...