Well, I am a political science professional and never heard such a definition of Liberalism. Would Conservatism be also a 'sociology' per the same logic?

Bigruss, you sure are entitled to your opinions, but please, please don't associate them with Jesus or Christianity, your theology is upside down, and it's exactly the kind of theology making young people abandon your so-called Christianity in droves. Jesus said God makes the Sun shine over the good and bad equally, where did you find that 'special revelation' about no quarter for LIBERAL nations? Would you care to provide any examples? Your Christianity sure doesn't see any problems with war and violence, which is exactly the opposite of what Jesus taught or of what the first Christians did when they went to the lions and refused to use violence. This theology is shameful.

Annfan, I bet you know absolutely nothing of those dictators you listed, except that they were some bad guys who did a lot of bad stuff. All of them were absolutists, which is the opposite of Obama's preaching of tolerance. Heck, I even bet you don't have the slightest idea what a liberal or a conservative is. You believe the definitions readily provided to you by Rush Limbaugh and Ann Coulter. That's why you only are a rushcoulterconservative, like most of posters here. Why did you never call Bush 'comrade Bush'? He sure did expand the government beyond any liberal's wildest dreams. And for what? For war, i.e. killing or guys as well as others. Hypocritical ignorance, thy name is rushcoulterconservative.

Hey mguy, will all due respect, your theology is awful and your historical & political knowledge history is even worse. Looks like you had the flu or something when your middle school teacher was explaining world history.

Truckman, just go and look at all indexes ever devised to measure human flourishing, like crime level, economic liberty level, societal trust level, freedom of press level, employment level, budget deficit level, etc, and you will notice the nations with more gun control and more equality like Norway, Switzerland, Germany, etc rank at the top of all such indexes. The big difference I think, is that their citizens don't see their governments as the enemy, but a just necessary structures in the general interest of the nation. They are as free as our dear old USA, if not more, they are at the top of economic freedom indexes. And they all have gun controls, so it must count for something. What's wrong with such societies?

Hey mguy, I bet you have never seen a Marxist in your life, nor have you the slightest idea what Marxism is. But to your point, I would say Obama's vision (or endgame) would be more something like Germany, Switzerland, Norway, etc, all capitalist economies, albeit with much greater quality than here. Incidentally, they all rank at the top of every index ever devised to measure human flourishing. Their citizens don't see their governments as the enemy, but a just necessary structures in the general interest of the nation. And don't think for a moment they they are not as 'free' as our dear old USA, they are at the top of economic freedom and press freedom as well. And they all have surplus budgets. What's wrong with such societies?

You should be ashamed! You should confess your sin of extreme callousness to your pastor, otherwise you risk your soul.

But war is usually the most stupid human activity, so there you go.

Is it just one party that's stupid?