In response to:

Todd Akin vs. Elizabeth Warren

Zak8 Wrote: Nov 08, 2012 2:57 PM
Akin and Warren. Two idiots. One lost the other won. That's the difference.
Todd189 Wrote: Nov 08, 2012 3:35 PM
If it were just Akin & Warren that would be one thing; but there are many more. Jesse Jackson Jr won a LANDSLIDE re-election from a psych ward at the Mayo Clinic. He's under criminal indictment and is in plea negotiations with the feds. Charles Rangel is a big-time tax cheat who should be in prison, let alone be re-elected for the second time after he was busted. On the other hand, Republican Duke Cunningham rots away in federal prison for taking payoffs. Bill Clinton serially harrassed women, perjured himself, was impeached (though not convicted by the Senate), but today is held in awe as the most popular Democrat in the country. This double-standard is allowed to exist because the media allows it to, promotes it, and uses it as a weapon.
skywalker58 Wrote: Nov 08, 2012 4:44 PM
Democrats have proven they don't care about character, past indiscretions or current legal issues. Democrats re-elected Marion Barry as mayor of Washington, D.C AFTER he had been convicted and served time for cocain possession while in office. As long as there is a "D" after their name and they say they are going to give out goodies and support far left causes, they'll get Democrat votes.

Many conservatives are still licking their wounds from election night, and understandably so.  It was ugly almost any way you slice it. As we move beyond the initial stages of political mourning, an intense round of Righty fratricide is on the way.  There will be nasty battles over the causes of Tuesday's mess, and vehement disagreements about where the Republican Party should go from here.  One of the suggested paths will be to moderate on a host of issues.  This approach may be wise on certain fronts, but wrong-headed on others.  That's a separate discussion for another day.  What...