In response to:

Rape, God, Life and Liberals

Zak8 Wrote: Oct 26, 2012 8:22 AM
For goodness sakes, why make statements you have to backtrack from days before an election? I don't want to defend people who have clarify or apologise. Seriously, they really need to use their brains.
rickmcq Wrote: Oct 26, 2012 8:58 AM
Too often, these "statements" are responses to questions that are asked by a Medioa that would never ask a troubling question of a Leftist candidate.

Let's stipulate that people, and particularly politicians, can get into trouble by attempting to speak for God. But that's not the moral of the story regarding Indiana Senate candidate Richard Mourdock.

Responding to a question about abortion, Mourdock offered a grieved response -- his voice breaking a bit -- on the matter of which exceptions he favored. His Democratic opponent, Joe Donnelly, also pro-life, said that he would permit abortions in cases of rape, incest and to save the life of the mother. Mourdock said he had "struggled with it . . . for a long time," but had come...

Thursday, June 20 | 03:12 AM ET
Thursday, June 20 | 03:12 AM ET
Thursday, June 20 | 03:12 AM ET
Thursday, June 20 | 03:12 AM ET