In response to:

What's Good for the Noose is Good for the Pander

you've been served Wrote: Nov 14, 2012 6:14 AM

A losing battle, Mike. Why. Because your position requires explanation -- detailed explanation. The sinful position, the liberal position, requires only a sound bite. The brain dead masses do not listen to explanations. That requires an effort. That requires thinking. These are low information voters. They want only a sound bite. And the liberal media and the liberal intelligentsia work overtime to come up with fresh sound bites. Me, I can hardly wait for the Second Coming so we can get this embarrassing stain called the human race off the planet.

Join the Debate!

All comments and users are subject to Townhall's new comments policy.

Marie150 Wrote: Nov 14, 2012 7:08 AM

Thank God He is more merciful than we.

Flag as Offensive

Post Comment

Read Full Story

What's Good for the Noose is Good for the Pander

Recently, Ann Coulter wrote a controversial column suggesting that numerous Republican losses in the 2012 election cycle could be tied to the GOP stance on abortion. After lamenting the problem, she suggested a solution: the GOP should officially abandon its opposition to the so-called rape exception to a ban on abortion.

Ann's position on this matter is wrong for three reasons. First, it is unprincipled. Second, it will not be received with the popular support she envisions. Third, it is not the best political response to the problem. After elaborating on each problem associated with Ann's position, I propose an...

Related Tags: A Culture of Life Abortion Ann Coulter abortion and rape