In response to:

The Case Against “Equality” Part 2

yankette Wrote: Mar 02, 2013 10:13 AM
Robert, you're correct to an extent but you're missing the point. If 2 gay people got married in my state today, it would not cause trouble or interfere with my life or rights immediately. But the main point is twofold which I kindly ask you to focus on: 1) gay mrriage is an erosion of culture and society OVER TIME. (This is not meant to offend you or anyone who is gay) Sure, nothing happens immediately if gay marriage were the law of the land but over time, more problems and challenges will arise. iI think a lot of people miss this. 2) Anytime one value is promoted, celebrated, esteemed, given more attention, etc. than another, such as gay marriage over natural, as you see so much in our culture and media today, cont.

In yesterday’s column, I listed some of the benefits that natural marriage provides children and society. But some claim that promoting natural marriage exclusively violates the rights of people who are attracted to the same sex. That’s not true. The three P’s will help us see why.

The government has only three options in addressing human behavior. It can prohibit a behavior, it can permit a behavior or it can promote a behavior—the three P’s.

Our laws prohibit sexual relationships such as polygamy, incest and pedophilia. They permit homosexual relationships and non-marital heterosexual relationships. And due to the immense...