In response to:

The Case Against “Equality” Part 2

yankette Wrote: Mar 01, 2013 2:46 PM
Robert, please read the article. The kindly respond with actual facts, instead of name calling. If you haven't read the article then you are in denial.
Robert1824 Wrote: Mar 01, 2013 4:10 PM
I DID read the article, and DID resond with facts, and what I said was not name-calling, JUST THE FACTS . It;'s YOU and the other right-wingers here who don't understand Turek's REAL sinister agenda .
yankette Wrote: Mar 01, 2013 3:01 PM
Jack, first, please re-read the article. The author's "entire argument" does NOT rest on the concern that gay marriage will damage straight marriage.

Second, gay marriage (which is misnomer) DOES harm marriage. It devalues and debases marriage, society, cultures.
Jack2894 Wrote: Mar 01, 2013 2:52 PM
I read the article, and yesterday's preface. His entire argument rests on the concern that gay marriage will somehow damage straight marriage. Yet he did nothing to show that would happen, nor has anyone else here.

I will give you a dollar for every straight couple that decides not to get married because gay marriage is legal if you will give me a penny for every straight couple that does get married even though gay marriage is legal. Deal?
yankette Wrote: Mar 01, 2013 2:46 PM
typo - if you have read the article then you are in denial

In yesterday’s column, I listed some of the benefits that natural marriage provides children and society. But some claim that promoting natural marriage exclusively violates the rights of people who are attracted to the same sex. That’s not true. The three P’s will help us see why.

The government has only three options in addressing human behavior. It can prohibit a behavior, it can permit a behavior or it can promote a behavior—the three P’s.

Our laws prohibit sexual relationships such as polygamy, incest and pedophilia. They permit homosexual relationships and non-marital heterosexual relationships. And due to the immense...