In response to:

The Senate Must Reject Hagel

xjnyc_2013 Wrote: Feb 05, 2013 8:08 PM
Oh stop with the Happy Horschitt Lesser Limbaugh. LOL! The ONLY reason you're howling like a stuck pig about this is to make trouble, or make it difficult for the Dems. "The Senate Must Reject Hagel" Yes, Pompous Twit -- you just keep knocking yourself out -- between you and Blubbering Bro and Donnie "Le Douwche" Trump you just keep howling at the moon, boys -- the entertainment value alone is worth it!
karpe diem Wrote: Feb 06, 2013 12:55 AM
anyone who fails to see the utter incompetence of Hagel is lacking in intelligence.he is a bumbling witness, has to retract every answer, which not only was incorrect but showed such ignorance that he should ask to be relieved of his nomination. but apparently he does not know what shame is.
wgraff Wrote: Feb 06, 2013 12:20 AM
Wow, that's pretty harsh for someone that can't afford a vowel. But hey, go ahead and enjoy your extremely high unemployment rate and the falling value of the dollar if it makes you feel superior, go for it, lamebrain.

The Senate's "advice and consent" role doesn't require it to rubber-stamp a presidential appointee for secretary of defense who senators believe would weaken America in this increasingly dangerous world.

Notwithstanding former Sen. Chuck Hagel's diminished view of the post -- "I won't be in a policymaking position" -- the secretary of defense is an exceedingly important position and must be filled with someone who understands the complexity and gravity of the threats we face.

In his testimony at his confirmation hearing, Hagel demonstrated a remarkable unwillingness to clarify his past statements, a stunning misapprehension of the identity, intentions and capabilities...

Wednesday, May 22 | 07:33 AM ET
Wednesday, May 22 | 07:33 AM ET
Wednesday, May 22 | 07:33 AM ET
Wednesday, May 22 | 07:33 AM ET