It will be dismissed as Partisan Garbage. No doubt about it.

I can see it now: "Vote for me and I'll repeal the law that allows access for poor and lower-income middle class people access to affordable health care. That's a good thing, right?" Vote for me and I'll repeal the law that prevents insurance companies from denying pre-existing conditions. That's a good thing right?" How's Romney going to spin this? The rich white guy vowing to bankrupt the middle-class because of their health conditions? Not a chance -- this is Obama's moment to shine.

There won't be a "rollback." What's the liklihood of taking away a benefit for poor people once it's been enacted? What are they going to suggest in REAL terms -- that those who benefit from this will be tossed out of their plans and once again have no insurance? You can talk about 'liberty and freedom" as a lofty ideal, but when it comes down to implementation and you're leaving the poor without access to health care, who thinks THAT's a good idea or a good platform to run on?

LOL! Sorry guys but it sounds like Cantor is wetting his panties on this. Obama never said you can't keep your healthcare, AND the Repubs don't have another plan to offer. You can vow to "repeal" all you want but I'd love to see Romney run his campaign based upon denying the poor and lower middle-class access to affordable health care. Good Luck with that.

Well, it amazes me that people play into her game like that. You might not like my views, but I come by them honestly -- making up an entire 'second fantasy life' just to get people angry at you so they'll say awful things to you to get you excited, is a perverted form of masochism -- you can't get someone to physically assault you, so you goad them on so they'll attack you with words. It's a psychiatric disorder and while playing on the internet is harmless enough, one day you might actually get someone to truly do damage to you physically. I suggest you see a shrink -- pronto

LOL!! Bush hid in his secret bunker after the attack-- what "kids" are you talking about? He hid out for 4 days until he finally made an appearance in NYC. If he had the courage, he would have flown to NYC that evening -- the disaster happened at 8:45 AM -- but he had to have his steak dinner and his workout and get to bed early. The point is, it doesn't matter what stupid sex scandal is going on -- state and national politics, particularly for a Pres. election have almost nothing in common. It doesn't make a damn bit of difference is the NC'ers love him or hate him -- the city is making a buttload of money on the convention, so you can bet they'll be nice!

As for DNC Disaster, why just ask "lil Skippy" Gu Benson about the "disaster" that he hear from an "unnamed source" that would happen at CPAC when the Dems would storm the place and disrupt everything. No one even knew it was happening and it will be the same with both Conventions -- unless you're interested, you won't even know it's happening.

Really feeble this time, Malkin. In 2004, the Repubs held their convention in NYC -- mid-town Manhattan. Most NY'ers couldn't stand Bush and remembered his performance during 9/11 where he sat cringing and cowering in his bunker while Guiliani took charge and took all the risks Point is -- the convention was held in NYC 3 years later and no one cared what the local NYC residents thought. It was a National Convention for the Pres. nominee and the local and state parties frankly, don't matter at all. No one cares about local scandals or how NC voted on gay marriage. The Convention is a closed event,.

"People are asking..." What' "people, " Limby? People like you are asking -- people who's agenda in life seems to be to trash Obama every chance they get. Any survey will tell you that most people don't give a crap who marries who as long as they are both adults, have not been coerced, threatened or intimidated, and are of sound mind. Only bottom-dwellers like you care about this issue

Again, what an embarrassment this little twerp Bobby is. He's so desperate to gain "cred" (or in his case "crud") with the toothless, backwards gang that he'll spew whatever he's told to spew. News for Jindal: That kind of childish, whiney, trash-talk says more about you than it does about Obama. Any idiot can hurl insults -- we expect that someone who's in the role of a State Governor can speak to why he believes someone's policies are bad and we certainly don't expect this kind of illiterate and frankly, stupid comment.