1 - 10 Next
LOL! All you have to do is substitute "Liberals" for the word "Conservatives" and you'll have the opposing view. It's kind of ignorant to just state "Well, we're correct and you just won't listen" -- and incredibly naive. Surely, that's just an act -- if you seriously believe that an articulate argument is stating that you're correct and no one listens to you then I suggest you wear a drool bib and quickly!
You're free to start it up. Good luck with that -- you'll need it.
You're free to start it up. Good luck with that -- you'll need it.
Forcing a 15 year old girl who's in her first trimester of pregnancy to view a late-term abortion is not education -- it's punishment. Don't fool yourself. And you're contradicting yourself: You're stating that you should tell girls that abortion is wrong and evil but the life of a single mother means a lifetime of poverty. You're asking a teenage girl what they should choose? If the baby has two caucasion parents, chances of adoption are good. If the baby is black, hispanic, mixed race or any other race, chances of adoption are poor. That's a fact. The baby will end up in a foster home, or basically an old-fashioned orphanage. Are there any other alternatives?
Forcing a 15 year old girl who's in her first trimester of pregnancy to view a late-term abortion is not education -- it's punishment. Don't fool yourself. And you're contradicting yourself: You're stating that you should tell girls that abortion is wrong and evil but the life of a single mother means a lifetime of poverty. You're asking a teenage girl what they should choose? If the baby has two caucasion parents, chances of adoption are good. If the baby is black, hispanic, mixed race or any other race, chances of adoption are poor. That's a fact. The baby will end up in a foster home, or basically an old-fashioned orphanage. Are there any other alternatives?
I think if Townhall really didn't want people to post opposing views, they would either not offer the option to post at all, or they would clearly say that if you disagree with the story, you can't post. Discussing opposing views is the American Way --unfortunately, too many people get frustrated and can't come up with or articulate their argument, so they just start to dribble out their hatred. That's unfortunate.
Any thought that even suggests that forcing another human being to submit to a violent act is enough. His apology for the awkward phrasing doesn't change the fact that the Moron believed that you can quantify a violent act as legit, probably meaning if the woman was physically forced to have sex by her husband, then that doesn't count as "Rape" There is no acceptable apology for that kind of thinking. The "disgrace" was not that this "poor man" was completely discredited but that he wasn't hung by his balls
Any thought that even suggests that forcing another human being to submit to a violent act is enough. His apology for the awkward phrasing doesn't change the fact that the Moron believed that you can quantify a violent act as legit, probably meaning if the woman was physically forced to have sex by her husband, then that doesn't count as "Rape" There is no acceptable apology for that kind of thinking. The "disgrace" was not that this "poor man" was completely discredited but that he wasn't hung by his balls
Of course it's not possible that this Mike Lee could be mistaken could it? Of course not! And aren't these elected officials adults? Can't they demand the time they need within reason, to read the bill? "Arm-twisting" is a metaphor -- no one literally twists your arm, so instead of taking his word for it why not ask the Upper Chamber members if they read it? Or is somewhat accurate reporting too much to ask?
1 - 10 Next