In response to:

Let’s Have That Conversation About Guns

wtmoore1 Wrote: Dec 17, 2012 2:33 PM
Tibby, Conservatives easily dismiss conversations they don't want to have--so it has nothing to do with the failure of either side to use the appropriate lexicon. Despite the fact that many who have little experience with firearms may not be acquainted with their technical specifics, that doesn't undermine their credibility when speaking in terms of policy about desired outcomes. That is to say, just because I don't know the difference between an "assault rifle" and other types of semi-automatic weapons does not mean that I am too unintelligent to have a conversation about the effect of guns as a whole on my community. Be honest, many on the right will find ANY excuse not to engage the left on this issue.
BK22 Wrote: Dec 17, 2012 3:53 PM
Liberals are the ones who profess that removing the fire will prevent you from getting burned but their naive solution ignors the simple fact that you wouldn't get burned if you wouldn't stick your hand in the fire.

For once I agree with liberals. It’s high time to have a conversation about guns. Let’s start with the problem that there are far too few guns on our streets.

Wait, we can’t have that conversation. In fact, we’re not supposed to have what people might commonly describe as a “conversation” at all. We’re supposed to shut-up and listen as liberals, barely masking their unseemly delight at the opportunity, try to pin the murder rampage of one degenerate creep on millions of law-abiding Americans who did nothing wrong. The conversation is then supposed to end with us waiving our fundamental right...