1 - 10 Next
In response to:

Rush vs. Rush on Mitt Romney

WSV Wrote: Oct 14, 2011 3:46 PM
No its how it is parroted. It is the same lines over and over again or shoud I say the same lies over and over again. I mean you can almost name which news media you progressives got your lines from. The press is promoting Obama just like they did in 2008, its embarrassing! If you do not agree then you are no different then the cow following the lead cow to slaughter. When you think for yourself you read legitimate books based on historical fact and you then can see trends. We repeat history only because we have forgotten history or history has been rewritten to serve an agenda (Progressives - Bill Ayers, Bernadine Dorn (Sp). Most people have no idea who these people are or their ties to Obama.
In response to:

Rush vs. Rush on Mitt Romney

WSV Wrote: Oct 14, 2011 3:39 PM
Good points. Finally someone who is not against Romney because he is Mormon (Christian) but because of specific, truthful, fact based foundations. Wow, isn't it nice to hear a profound thought process as opposed to these evangelical leftists who want to tell the world Mormonism is not Christian. Stop voting for people because they are black, or evangelical, or good looking and start voting for someone based on their principles and how they will run this country. I will be voting for Herman Cain because of his straight forward conservative views and his love of this country. He has a plan called 999. Geezy Pete, our president and his regime has been running this country without a budget and then asking to raise taxes! The stupidity!
In response to:

Assessing the Dartmouth Debate

WSV Wrote: Oct 12, 2011 10:11 AM
Name one lie of Bachman, just one that you can back up with facts.? Know name just one lie of Obama which you can back up with facts. Heck it would take about two seconds to get 100 lies that Obama has told with just a few clicks of a button yet you would not be able to come up with one. This is the definition of close minded; however, progressives have changed the definition of closed minded to anyone who does not agree with their beliefs.
In response to:

Assessing the Dartmouth Debate

WSV Wrote: Oct 12, 2011 10:07 AM
Exactly! The fun thing to do on this sight is pick out those who pretend they are Republican and then parrot the remarks of CNN, MSNBC, MEDIA MATTERS and so forth. It is fun because they think we are so stupid and can't recognize that they are part of a Community Organized group that logs onto specific sites trying to move voters away from certain candidates.
In response to:

Assessing the Dartmouth Debate

WSV Wrote: Oct 12, 2011 10:04 AM
I think Newt is a very intelligent guy and could have had a real shot for the presidency had he not revealed himself by attacking the tea party. I think he knows he doesn't have a chance now and is milking the publicity, just like you said.
In response to:

Assessing the Dartmouth Debate

WSV Wrote: Oct 12, 2011 10:01 AM
What is a right wing progressive? Progressives are those who believe in a facist/Communist ideology who want to have the power. They want to label anyone who doesn't believe they are in line with their beliefs. Progressives are known for destroying other peoples characters through rhetoric and lies and justify all the evil they do by saying, "The ends justify the means" Evangelicals are exactly like progressives! Romney is not anywhere near the mindset of a progressive. He does believe in our Constitional Republic so that does makes him right wing as opposed to progressives that hate our Constitution and praise communism which makes them left wing.
In response to:

Assessing the Dartmouth Debate

WSV Wrote: Oct 12, 2011 9:52 AM
Bachman, Herman Cain or Romney can all beat Obama. Obama has a track record of extreme radicalism an ideology that is running this country into the ground. When Obama supported the thugs walking on wallstreet while calling the tea party thugs he has revealed himself. He revealed himself by not securing the boarders and then we find out he is arming the cartels through his fast and furious program. Obama is aware that Al Queda is in Mexico running the cartels and refuses to close the boarders? He hired Van Jones who said he would use his job as the Green Czar to not change the American system but to completely destroy it. He said he would completely crush it from the top down, inside out and bottom up. Van Jones is a devout communist!
In response to:

Assessing the Dartmouth Debate

WSV Wrote: Oct 12, 2011 9:45 AM
Let me guess you are a democrat. Anyone of the Republican candidates have better qualifications than Obama. Remember, Americans haven't forgotten that Obama has run this country without a budget, spent trillions of dollars that are all but unaccounted for although you can paint a pretty compelling argument that the money all went to his supporters such as the union and gree peace people. He has hired communist and communist loving people to his CZAR teams (i.e. Van Jones). Obama is a radical and although the progressives have spent almost 70 years changing our education system to pump out radicals it is not going to be enough. The only thing that will elect Obama is these evangelicals who tell everyone who is Christian and who is not.
In response to:

Assessing the Dartmouth Debate

WSV Wrote: Oct 12, 2011 9:34 AM
I really like Bachman as well because she is for real. She has stood on tough issues when it was not politically correct and her peers folded. She has been fighting the progressives forever even when she was surrounded by them. She has never, ever backed off. The liberal media has attacked her every waking moment to try and destroy her character like they do with anyone who they think is a treat to their communist idealog. As far as Cain, just remember he has a plan and whether it is perfect or not would not be the issue. The issue is he has a plan and now it can be tweeked until it addresses any major issues. Romney has a plan and so does Paul Ryan but the president doesn't.
In response to:

Assessing the Dartmouth Debate

WSV Wrote: Oct 12, 2011 9:27 AM
The fact that cain even has a plan is amazing when you think of Obama running this country without a budget. Also, I understand why he wouldn't reveal who he is going to appoint at this time and why he would want to keep that close to his vest. Mr. Cain is not stupid, he realizes that no matter who he appoints the liberal media will dominate the media and create issues that will be detractors at this point. Also, knowing what he can do as president and what he can't do as president at this point doesn't bother me. I am sure Obama and every other president had advisors that they consulted with who were experts in the field. What I like about Cain is he is straight up and passionate with his answers. I do like Romney as well.
1 - 10 Next
Monday, June 04 | 03:30 PM ET
Monday, June 04 | 03:30 PM ET
Monday, June 04 | 03:30 PM ET
Monday, June 04 | 03:30 PM ET