In response to:
"Your hero is fading fast now"
Grifter, peruse this and then try to reconcile your inane comment with what it says:
http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/10/29/oct-28-in-swing-states-a-predictable-election/#more-36832
Wishful thinking indeed...
There has been just about one constant up for discussion in an electoral season filled with tumultuous polling: Nate Silver.
Nate Silver is the statistician and poll-watching guru who rose to prominence in 2008 by developing a poll aggregation model that correctly predicted 49 of 50 states in that year's presidential contest. He has since been hired by the New York Times and gained more prominence with his up-to-the-minute analysis on new polls and the state of the presidential race.
Conservatives have attacked Silver relentlessly for his model that predicts that President Obama with a 70%+ chance to win...
Which explains why you and your fellow idiots pretend that Fox is so biased and wrong, but The NY Times is so honest and truthfull.
"Let me be as diplomatic as possible - YOU-ARE-AN-IDIOT!"
Look in the mirror to see an idiot, especially considering your mindless worship of spmeone who has been doing his level best to destroy America. So you can add traitor to your self description as well.
And you say I'm an angry child?
You seem to judge the veracity of EVERYTHING based on the source, not on the actual data. You lack the basic ability to distinguish reality from fantasy.
Let me be as diplomatic as possible - YOU-ARE-AN-IDIOT!
It might make things simpler, but let's stick with the Constitution.
Let's just call off the election and call Romney the winner then.
What a dolt!
Only a demoshill like you considers the NY Times to be anything but a prog propaganda piece, wsmith.
And you call others "nutters"?
I don't need to peruse anything you're reading. No need. I gather my intel from RELIABLE sources.
Your guy is LOSING, Wsmith. Start wrapping your addled brain around that.