In response to:

The Need for Semi-Automatic "Assault" Weapons

wsimpson Wrote: Jan 12, 2013 3:06 PM
Bobby, I think bullets flying around, are going to be exactly "what" we need. And most insurance policies, have some restrictions on this type loss.
Frank391 Wrote: Jan 13, 2013 9:53 AM
And assuming that they had insurance. Many of those mom & pop type stores didn't have insurance. So when it goes up in flames they would have lost everything.

By now, we’ve heard the argument about semi-automatic "assault" rifles: nobody needs one. We’ve heard the only reason why someone would obtain this kind of weapon is so they can kill people, which is far from the truth. We’ve also heard the argument from both the Left and the Right that a pistol is how someone protects their home.

"I really don’t know why people need assault weapons. I’m not a hunter but I understand people who want to hunt," Republican Rep. Peter King said on Morning Joe earlier this week. "I understand people who live in rough neighborhoods...